Federal contractor · ABERDEEN, MD

CITY OF ABERDEEN

CITY OF ABERDEEN received $7.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (+0.3% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $73.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($7.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$7.6M
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
RLNBGBB44MM6
Other than small businessGovernment entity
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6.9MFY2017
  2. 11.3MFY2018
  3. 6.9MFY2019
  4. 6.1MFY2020
  5. 5.4MFY2021
  6. 5.5MFY2022
  7. 6MFY2023
  8. 10.2MFY2024
  9. 7.6MFY2025
  10. 7.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$7.6M100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$7.6M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Harford County, MD$7.6M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $7.6M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $7.6M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. 200012!2100!001188!AD05 !USA MATERIEL COMMAND ACQUISITION!DAAD0599C0008 !A!*!P00003 !20000512!20000630!098661465!098661465!098661465!Y!* !CITY OF ABERDEEN !3 WEST BEL AIR AVENUE !ABERDEEN !MD!21001!00125!025!24!ABERDEEN !HARFORD !MARYLAND !0001!+000001015817!N!N!000000000000!S114!WATER SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !4952!3!*!*!D!B!*!*!* !*!*!0!000!*!* !*!*!*!* !* !*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!* !*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!$199.9M
    Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Dec 1, 2016 – Mar 19, 2026· DAAD0599C0008

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RIVERBEND WATER RESOURCES DISTRICT$24.7M−56% in FY2026
    NEW BOSTON, TX · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Water, sewage and other systems
  2. BAY STATE UTILITY SERVICES, LLC$13.6M−68% in FY2026
    BUZZARDS BAY, MA · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Water, sewage and other systems
  3. AHTNA USA-CDM JV$48.5M−105% in FY2026
    WEST SACRAMENTO, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Water, sewage and other systems

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • City of Aberdeen, MarylandAI match · 99%
  • City of AberdeenAI match · 98%
Lobbying · 2025
$116K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$386K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$96K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$116K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$116K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$58K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Transportation28 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations20 reports
  3. Disaster planning and emergencies14 reports
  4. Roads and highways14 reports
  5. Urban development and municipalities14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES28 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE28 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Commonwealth Strategic Partners, LLC$140K
    8 reports
  2. Gordon Thomas Honeywell Governmental Affairs$126K
    14 reports
  3. THE RESERVE COMPONENT$120K
    6 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.