Federal contractor · ALCOA, TN

CITY OF ALCOA

CITY OF ALCOA received $99.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (+2.9% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $844.5K. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($99.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$99.9K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
LAPRCB3THXR5
Other than small businessGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 75KFY2017
  2. 75.8KFY2018
  3. 77.4KFY2019
  4. 79.1KFY2020
  5. 80.3KFY2021
  6. 81.4KFY2022
  7. 85.6KFY2023
  8. 92.9KFY2024
  9. 97.1KFY2025
  10. 99.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$99.9K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $99.9K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $99.9K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Blount County, TN· Facilities & utilities· Oct 7, 2016 – Nov 13, 2025· W912L711C0001

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

CITY OF ALCOA received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards), −100% vs FY2025.

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 160KFY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2025.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $500K (2 subawards)

1 prime

  1. NASHVILLE, TN · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $550.6K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $500K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $1.1M reported

  1. NASHVILLE, TN · 9 subawards
  2. NASHVILLE, TN · 2 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WALLA WALLA, WA · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Electric power generation, transmission and distribution
  2. GREENVILLE, AL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Electric power generation, transmission and distribution
  3. APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY$260.1K−53% in FY2026
    COLUMBUS, OH · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Electric power generation, transmission and distribution

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.