Federal contractor · DETROIT, MI

CITY OF DETROIT WATER & SEWERAGE

No contract obligations recorded for CITY OF DETROIT WATER & SEWERAGE in FY2026. Since FY2017: $831.4K. It also received $5M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
JMBRMBB9KSC5
Parent company
CITY OF DETROIT
Other than small businessGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 667.3KFY2017
  2. 81KFY2024
  3. 83.1KFY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for CITY OF DETROIT WATER & SEWERAGE in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

CITY OF DETROIT WATER & SEWERAGE received $5M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 2 actions (1 new awards). Its largest program was 66.443 · Reducing Lead in Drinking Water (Sdwa 1459B) ($5M).

Assistance · FY2026
$5M
New awards
1
Actions
2
Since FY2022
$5.9M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 900KFY2022
  2. 0FY2025
  3. 5MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$5M100%

Top programs

  1. 66.443 · Reducing Lead in Drinking Water (Sdwa 1459B)$5M100%

Awarding agencies

Largest awards

  1. 66.443 · Reducing Lead in Drinking Water (Sdwa 1459B)· Environmental Protection Agency· Project grant· May 2, 2023 – Mar 11, 2026· 00E03346
  2. 66.443 · Reducing Lead in Drinking Water (Sdwa 1459B)· Environmental Protection Agency· Grant· Aug 30, 2026 – Aug 30, 2026· 00E08004

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2022–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $1.3M (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. DIMONDALE, MI · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $2M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $8.1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.2M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $12.6M reported

  1. DIMONDALE, MI · 9 subawards
  2. LANSING, MI · 1 subaward
  3. WASHINGTON, DC · 3 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. COUNTY OF LEWIS$170.2K−67% in FY2026
    LOWVILLE, NY · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other support services
  2. RANDIVE, INC OF NEW JERSEY$176.6K−4.8% in FY2026
    KEYPORT, NJ · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other support services
  3. INDIANAPOLIS, IN · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • City of DetroitAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$200K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$550K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$200K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$50K
    3 reports
  3. 2025$200K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$100K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Transportation11 reports
  2. Urban development and municipalities11 reports
  3. Energy and nuclear6 reports
  4. Environment and Superfund6 reports
  5. Budget and appropriations5 reports
  6. Clean air and water5 reports
  7. Housing5 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES11 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE11 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. BOUNDARY STONE PARTNERS$300K
    6 reports
  2. Squire Patton Boggs$250K
    7 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.