Federal contractor · HOT SPRINGS NATIONAL PARK, AR

CITY OF HOT SPRINGS

CITY OF HOT SPRINGS received $22.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (+5.3% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $82.9K. Its largest customer was National Park Service ($22.2K). It also received $4.1M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$22.2K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
JBMLW6N98W49
Other than small businessGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 19.6KFY2023
  2. 20KFY2024
  3. 21.1KFY2025
  4. 22.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$22.2K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $22.2K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $22.2K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. National Park Service· Garland County, AR· Professional services· Sep 6, 2023 – May 14, 2026· 140P6223P0053

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

CITY OF HOT SPRINGS received $4.1M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 14 actions (6 new awards), −45% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 20.933 · National Infrastructure Investments ($1.5M).

Assistance · FY2026
$4.1M
New awards
6
Actions
14
Since FY2021
$33.4M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 13.5MFY2021
  2. 1.8MFY2022
  3. 1.8MFY2023
  4. 4.6MFY2024
  5. 7.5MFY2025
  6. 4.1MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$4.1M100%

Top programs

  1. 20.933 · National Infrastructure Investments$1.5M38%
  2. 20.507 · Federal Transit Formula Grants$1.1M26%
  3. 20.117 · Airport Infrastructure Grants$797.7K19%
  4. 14.218 · Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants$419.6K10%
  5. 16.070 · Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Act$200K4.9%
  6. 20.526 · Buses and Bus Facilities Formula, Competitive, and Low or No Emissions Programs$90.6K2.2%
  7. 20.106 · Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Programs, and COVID-19 Airports Programs-$20.2K0.0%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Transportation
  2. Department of Transportation
  3. Department of Transportation
  4. Department of Housing and Urban Development
  5. Department of Justice

Largest awards

  1. 20.507 · Federal Transit Formula Grants· Federal Transit Administration· Formula grant· Dec 23, 2025 – Dec 23, 2025· AR-2020-008
  2. 20.933 · National Infrastructure Investments· Federal Highway Administration· Project grant· Mar 12, 2026 – Mar 12, 2026· 693JJ32640452
  3. 20.507 · Federal Transit Formula Grants· Federal Transit Administration· Formula grant· Aug 27, 2026 – Aug 27, 2026· AR-2026-012
  4. 20.106 · Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Programs, and COVID-19 Airports Programs· Federal Aviation Administration· Project grant· Nov 12, 2025 – Nov 12, 2025· 30500310282020
  5. 20.507 · Federal Transit Formula Grants· Federal Transit Administration· Formula grant· Feb 13, 2025 – Sep 17, 2026· AR-2025-007
  6. 20.117 · Airport Infrastructure Grants· Federal Aviation Administration· Project grant· Jul 14, 2026 – Jul 14, 2026· 30500310412026

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $239.3K (3 subawards)

2 primes

  1. LITTLE ROCK, AR · 2 subawards
  2. DEPARTMENT OF HERITAGE ARKANSAS$77.8K32%
    LITTLE ROCK, AR · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $237.9K paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2023: $119.3K paid out · $39.7K received
  • FY2024: $93.2K paid out · $213.8K received
  • FY2025: $54K paid out · $134.9K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $239.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

7 companies · $504.5K reported

  1. OUACHITA REGIONAL COUNSELING AND MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC$127.1K
    HOT SPRINGS, AR · 1 subaward
  2. UNITED WAY OF THE OUACHITAS$119.3K
    HOT SPRINGS NATIONAL PARK, AR · 1 subaward
  3. OUACHITA CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC$93.2K
    HOT SPRINGS, AR · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $1.7M reported

  1. DEPT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION$1.1M
    LITTLE ROCK, AR · 4 subawards
  2. LITTLE ROCK, AR · 6 subawards
  3. DEPARTMENT OF HERITAGE ARKANSAS$154.8K
    LITTLE ROCK, AR · 2 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KINGSVILLE, TX · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Justice, public order, and safety activities
  2. RIDGELAND, MS · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Justice, public order, and safety activities
  3. EDMONSON COUNTY FISCAL COURT$155.3K+24% in FY2026
    BROWNSVILLE, KY · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Justice, public order, and safety activities

Showing the top 3 of 4 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.