Federal contractor · MADISON, IL

CITY OF MADISON

CITY OF MADISON received $19K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−4.5% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $197K. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($19K).

Obligations · FY2026
$19K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
WNNMTRD1DLK8
Other than small businessGovernment entity
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 20KFY2017
  2. 20KFY2018
  3. 19.7KFY2019
  4. 19.7KFY2020
  5. 19.5KFY2021
  6. 19.3KFY2022
  7. 19.9KFY2023
  8. 19.9KFY2024
  9. 19.9KFY2025
  10. 19KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$19K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$19K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. St. Charles County, MO$19K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $19K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $19K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES CITY OF MADISON$78.7K
    Department of the Army· St. Charles County, MO· Facilities & utilities· May 25, 2023 – Feb 23, 2026· W912P923P0030

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

CITY OF MADISON received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 1.1KFY2022

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2022.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GRAYSON COUNTY$59K+8.2% in FY2026
    SHERMAN, TX · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Justice, public order, and safety activities
  2. COUNTY OF ANGELINA$62.3K+4.1% in FY2026
    LUFKIN, TX · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Justice, public order, and safety activities
  3. GEARY COUNTY SHERIFF$55K
    JUNCTION CITY, KS · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Justice, public order, and safety activities

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.