Federal contractor · BUTTE, MT
CLARK FORK AND BLACKFOOT, L.LC., THE
CLARK FORK AND BLACKFOOT, L.LC., THE received -$34.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards. Since FY2017: $7.1M. Its largest customer was Indian Health Service (-$34.8K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- -$34.8K
- New awards
- 1
- Sole-source
- —
- Single offer
- —
- UEI
- F2KCESBN9FN1
- Parent company
- NORTHWESTERN CORP
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
Part of the NORTHWESTERN CORP company family: 2 registered entities, $4.5M in FY2026 together. See the family
- NORTHWESTERN CORPSIOUX FALLS, SD · Family page$4.6M
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 3.4MFY2017
- 2.7MFY2018
- 1.1MFY2019
- -47KFY2020
- -4KFY2021
- -3FY2025
- -34.8KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Indian Health Service-$34.8K0.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
Where the work was performed
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
Largest awards
- Indian Health Service· Blaine County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Sep 9, 2017 – Aug 28, 2026· HHSI244201700022A
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
1 company · $649.6K reported
- HELENA, MT · 4 subawards
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- CITY OF HAMILTON$1.1M−48% in FY2026HAMILTON, MT · 8.4% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Administration of economic programs
- THE POTOMAC EDISON CO$39.2M−37% in FY2026WILLIAMSPORT, MD · 6 entities · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Electric power generation, transmission and distribution
- CONTINENTAL DIVIDE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.$3.5M−28% in FY2026GRANTS, NM · 7.9% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Electric power generation, transmission and distributionIndian Health Service · Electric power generation, transmission and distributionNational Park Service · Electric power generation, transmission and distribution+1 more
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.