Federal contractor · SAN ANTONIO, TX

CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, LLC

CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, LLC received $129.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−68% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.2M. Its largest customer was U.S. Special Operations Command ($115.4K).

Obligations · FY2026: $129.9K
New awards: 2
Sole-source: 11%
Single offer: 89%

UEI: DPD1FKEKGAK3
Parent company: CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR LLC

Other than small business

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

57.4KFY2017
7.5KFY2018
319.4KFY2019
159.9KFY2020
325.5KFY2021
298.6KFY2022
214.3KFY2023
285KFY2024
401.4KFY2025
129.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

U.S. Special Operations Command$115.4K89%
1 awards
Drug Enforcement Administration$14.5K11%
1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Professional services$129.9K100%

Where the work was performed

Onslow County, NC$115.4K89%
Cook County, IL$14.5K11%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Low competition100%
US 39% · $129.9K
Sole-source awards11%
US 30% · $14.5K
Single-offer competitions89%
US 8.7% · $115.4K
Urgency justifications0.0%
US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

Drug Enforcement Administration$14.5K
Department of Justice · 1 awards

Largest awards

SAN DIEGO AIRPORT ADVERTISING$219.5K
U.S. Special Operations Command· Onslow County, NC· Professional services· Aug 21, 2025 – May 26, 2026· H9225725PE033
PREVENTION SERVICES$14.5K
Drug Enforcement Administration· Cook County, IL· Professional services· Dec 30, 2025 – Dec 30, 2025· 15DDCH26P00000003

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

FIRST MEDIA, SOCIETATEA CU RASPUNDERE LIMITATA$768.9K
CHISINAU, MDA · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Special Operations Command · Advertising, public relations, and related services
DAA MONTENEGRO LLC$356.5K−100% in FY2026
PODGORICA, MNE · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Special Operations Command · Advertising, public relations, and related services
INTERSECTION MEDIA HOLDINGS INC$217.1K−100% in FY2026
NEW YORK, NY · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Special Operations Command · Advertising, public relations, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, LLC.AI match · 98%

PAC giving · 2026: $3,000; 1 PAC

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

Republican$2,00067%
Democratic$1,00033%

PACs sponsored

CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, LLC. PAC$100.8K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Members whose campaigns received from its PACs, 2026 cycle

Doug LaMalfa$1,000
R-CA-1 · House · 1 PAC
Jimmy Patronis$1,000
R-FL-1 · House · 1 PAC
Greg Stanton$1,000
D-AZ-4 · House · 1 PAC
Dina Titus$1,000
D-NV-1 · House · 1 PAC

$3,000 of the $3,000 its PACs gave to federal candidates went to 4 members of Congress.

Members whose campaigns received from its PACs, 2024 cycle

Greg Stanton$2,500
D-AZ-4 · House · 1 PAC
Eleanor Holmes Norton$1,500
D-DC · House · 1 PAC
David Scott$1,500
D-GA-13 · House · 1 PAC
Yassamin Ansari$1,000
D-AZ-3 · House · 1 PAC
Aaron Bean$1,000
R-FL-4 · House · 1 PAC

Direct and in-kind contributions the members' campaigns received (FEC), net of refunds. Party and seat are the member's current or latest.

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.