Federal contractor · PURDON, TX

CLIFF LATTA

CLIFF LATTA received $27.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+15% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $168.9K. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($27.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$27.2K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
50%
UEI
NL8AJ8Y7GKC1
Small businessNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 37.3KFY2020
  2. 22.4KFY2021
  3. 22.4KFY2022
  4. 22.4KFY2023
  5. 13.5KFY2024
  6. 23.7KFY2025
  7. 27.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$27.2K100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$13.7K50%
  2. Professional services$13.5K50%

Where the work was performed

  1. Lamar County, TX$13.7K50%
  2. Tarrant County, TX$13.5K50%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition50%
    US 39% · $13.5K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions50%
    US 8.8% · $13.5K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. W912BV25P0037 CONTRACT AWARD FOR BASE YEAR FOR GATE ATTENDANT SERVICES AT SANDERS COVE SHIFT B, PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX$27.3K
    Department of the Army· Lamar County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Mar 31, 2025 – Mar 16, 2026· W912BV25P0037
  2. WINTER GATE SOUTH HOLIDAY B BASE - GATE ATTENDANT$27K
    Department of the Army· Tarrant County, TX· Professional services· Sep 11, 2024 – Oct 6, 2025· W9126G24P0068

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MIDDLE TENNESSEE COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$64.4K
    NASHVILLE, TN · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · RV parks and recreational camps
  2. WATSON RICHARD L$64.7K−36% in FY2026
    PHENIX CITY, AL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · RV parks and recreational camps
  3. DAVID L MAPLES$65K+5% in FY2026
    HIGHLANDVILLE, MO · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · RV parks and recreational camps

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.