Federal contractor · HERNDON, VA
CLOUD LAKE TECHNOLOGY LLC
CLOUD LAKE TECHNOLOGY LLC received $9.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−78% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $421.8M. Its largest customer was U.S. Customs and Border Protection ($5.9M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $9.3M
- New awards
- 5
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- X8AWGED37S77
- Parent company
- CLOUD LAKE TECHNOLOGY LLC
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 12.1MFY2017
- 41.5MFY2018
- 62MFY2019
- 48.3MFY2020
- 73.1MFY2021
- 63.8MFY2022
- 40MFY2023
- 29.3MFY2024
- 42.3MFY2025
- 9.3MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- 1 awards
- Department of the Air Force$2.9M31%1 awards
- U.S. Coast Guard$234.1K2.5%1 awards
- Department of the Army$225.1K2.4%1 awards
- Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- IT & telecom$6.3M69%
- Research & development$2.9M31%
Where the work was performed
- Fairfax County, VA$9M97%
- District of Columbia, DC$234.1K2.5%
- Madison County, AL$5000.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Air Force· Fairfax County, VA· Research & development· May 31, 2020 – May 28, 2026· FA807520C0001
- U.S. Customs and Border Protection· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Jul 8, 2024 – Sep 9, 2026· 70B04C24F00000329
- U.S. Coast Guard· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Dec 22, 2022 – Apr 28, 2026· 70Z02323F73100002
- Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 5, 2025 – Dec 5, 2025· HQ085926FF082
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $2.9M paid out · $0 received
- FY2022: $4.9M paid out · $569.8K received
- FY2023: $6.3M paid out · $0 received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
23 companies · $14M reported
- SAN DIEGO, CA · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
- COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
- SERCO INC.$1.2MSAN DIEGO, CA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
Primes that pay it
1 company · $569.8K reported
- SUMARIA SYSTEMS, LLC$569.8KBEAVERCREEK, OH · 1 subaward · Wired telecommunications carriers
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- DARKHIVE INC.$53.4M+4,884% in FY2026SAN ANTONIO, TX · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
- LINTECH-PRAGMATICS JV LLC$43.5M−43% in FY2026RESTON, VA · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
- GRADKELL SYSTEMS INC$53.6M−16% in FY2026HUNTSVILLE, AL · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.