Federal contractor · VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
COASTAL MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS INC.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS INC. received $9.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−23% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $167.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($9.3M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $9.5M
- New awards
- 5
- Sole-source
- 68%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- WJNAKPFQWJC8
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 14.1MFY2017
- 18.9MFY2018
- 16.9MFY2019
- 17.6MFY2020
- 21.1MFY2021
- 19.2MFY2022
- 23.7MFY2023
- 14.2MFY2024
- 12.4MFY2025
- 9.5MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$9.3M98%4 awards
- Bureau of Engraving and Printing$220.6K2.3%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$8.8M93%
- Equipment maintenance$694.3K7.3%
Where the work was performed
- Shelby County, TN$6.5M68%
- Virginia Beach city, VA$2M21%
- San Diego County, CA$694.3K7.3%
- Tarrant County, TX$220.6K2.3%
- Kitsap County, WA$145.6K1.5%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition68%US 39% · $6.5M
- Sole-source awards68%US 30% · $6.5M
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications68%US 5.1% · $6.5M
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Navy· Virginia Beach city, VA· Professional services· Feb 7, 2023 – Jan 28, 2026· N0018923F3013
- TSC MID-ATLANTIC/SOUTH$10.5MDepartment of the Navy· Shelby County, TN· Professional services· Jul 31, 2025 – Jan 23, 2026· N0018925CZ096
- Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Mar 29, 2022 – Mar 16, 2026· N0024422F3007
- Bureau of Engraving and Printing· Tarrant County, TX· Professional services· May 24, 2021 – Aug 7, 2026· 2031ZA21C00288
- Department of the Navy· Kitsap County, WA· Professional services· Jan 16, 2025 – Jan 14, 2026· N4523A25F3000
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- GCR-MDI LLC$23.7M−0.2% in FY2026PINEHURST, NC · 2 entities · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Facilities support services
- YOKOSOH CO., LTD.$23.7M−32% in FY2026YOKOSUKA, JPN · 63% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Facilities support services
- KJS MP JOINT VENTURE LLC$20.8M−99% in FY2026FORT WORTH, TX · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Facilities support services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.