Federal contractor · HAWTHORNE, NY

COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC.

No contract obligations recorded for COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC. in FY2026. Since FY2017: $21K.

Obligations · FY2026: $0
New awards: 0
Sole-source: —
Single offer: —

UEI: G4BWTS3SNKQ1
Parent company: THE COCA-COLA COMPANY

Other than small business

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the THE COCA-COLA COMPANY company family: 12 registered entities, $2.5M in FY2026 together. See the family

THE COCA-COLA COMPANYATLANTA, GA · Family page
Reported parent$2.5M
BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF LOS ANGELESBREMERTON, WA
Reported parent$0
BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF LOS ANGELESSAN RAMON, CA
Reported parent$0
BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF LOS ANGELESSAN DIEGO, CA
Reported parent$0
COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC.ATLANTA, GA
Reported parent$0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

17.9KFY2017
3.1KFY2018

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT NETWORK, INC$12.1M−50% in FY2026
CARMEL, IN · 8 entities · 99.8% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Bakeries and tortilla manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Beverage manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Other food manufacturing
NORTHSTAR DISTRIBUTORS INC.$7.2M−15% in FY2026
SAN MARCOS, CA · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Bakeries and tortilla manufacturing
MS FRUIT & VEGETABLE CO LLC$4.4M+63% in FY2026
GRENADA, MS · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Bakeries and tortilla manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of THE COCA-COLA COMPANY (12 recipients).

Matched organizations

THE COCA-COLA COMPANYAI match · 100%

Lobbying · 2025: $5M; 24 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026: $17.5M; $17.4M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026: $108.5K; 1 PAC

Lobbying by year

2023$3.9M
32 reports
2024$4.9M
31 reports
2025$5M
24 reports
2026$3.6M
14 reports

Top issues

Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code50 reports
Agriculture49 reports
Beverage industry46 reports
Environment and Superfund36 reports
Trade (domestic and foreign)20 reports
Health issues7 reports
Transportation6 reports
Natural resources4 reports

Who was contacted

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES93 reports
U.S. SENATE88 reports
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)27 reports
Interior - Dept of (DOI)23 reports
Agriculture - Dept of (USDA)18 reports
Treasury - Dept of9 reports
White House Office9 reports
U.S. Forest Service8 reports
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ)6 reports
Natl Park Service (NPS)6 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

Squire Patton Boggs$1.2M
15 reports
Empire Consulting Group$700K
14 reports
The Washington Tax & Public Policy Group$680K
14 reports
Ervin Graves Strategy Group, LLC$450K
9 reports
Kountoupes Denham Carr & Reid, LLC$300K
6 reports
Imperium Global Advisors$280K
14 reports
FGS Global (US) LLC (FKA FGH Holdings LLC)$260K
7 reports
DLA Piper LLP (US)$0
8 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

Republican$74.5K69%
Democratic$34K31%

PACs sponsored

THE COCA-COLA COMPANY NONPARTISAN COMMITTEE FOR GOOD GOVERNMENT$228.8K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Members whose campaigns received from its PACs, 2026 cycle

Jason Smith$8,500
R-MO-8 · House · 1 PAC
Brian Jack$7,500
R-GA-3 · House · 1 PAC
Sanford D. Bishop, Jr.$6,000
D-GA-2 · House · 1 PAC
Earl L. "Buddy" Carter$5,000
R-GA-1 · House · 1 PAC
Mike Collins$5,000
R-GA-10 · House · 1 PAC
Steve Daines$5,000
R-MT · Senate · 1 PAC
Ron Estes$5,000
R-KS-4 · House · 1 PAC
Richard E. Neal$5,000
D-MA-1 · House · 1 PAC
Jimmy Panetta$5,000
D-CA-19 · House · 1 PAC
David Scott$5,000
D-GA-13 · House · 1 PAC

$108.5K of the $108.5K its PACs gave to federal candidates went to 35 members of Congress.

Members whose campaigns received from its PACs, 2024 cycle

Rick W. Allen$10K
R-GA-12 · House · 1 PAC
Sanford D. Bishop, Jr.$10K
D-GA-2 · House · 1 PAC
Barry Loudermilk$10K
R-GA-11 · House · 1 PAC
Lucy McBath$10K
D-GA-6 · House · 1 PAC
Richard McCormick$10K
R-GA-7 · House · 1 PAC

Direct and in-kind contributions the members' campaigns received (FEC), net of refunds. Party and seat are the member's current or latest.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

H.R. 5751 · To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the limitation on downward attribution of stock ownership in applying constructive ownership rules.10 reports
118th Congress · Introduced · 2023–2024
H.R. 7024 · Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 20248 reports
118th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2024
H.R. 2186 · To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the limitation on downward attribution of stock ownership in applying constructive ownership rules.7 reports
119th Congress · Introduced · 2025
H.R. 1 · An act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.5 reports
119th Congress · Became law · 2025
H.R. 6053 · Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act of 2023

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.