Federal contractor · IRON MOUNTAIN, MI

COLEMAN ENGINEERING COMPANY

COLEMAN ENGINEERING COMPANY received $550.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards. Since FY2017: $5.2M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($461.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$550.8K
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
84%
UEI
SNBQWJK6NTK5
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 502.9KFY2017
  2. 547.1KFY2018
  3. 907.2KFY2019
  4. 235.6KFY2020
  5. 311.3KFY2021
  6. 767.7KFY2022
  7. 681.2KFY2023
  8. 756.8KFY2024
  9. -17.9KFY2025
  10. 550.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$461.3K84%
    2 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$534K97%
  2. Construction & real property$16.8K3.1%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition84%
    US 39% · $461.3K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions84%
    US 8.7% · $461.3K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Forest Service· Gogebic County, MI· Professional services· Jan 27, 2026 – Jan 27, 2026· 12445526F0014
  2. Under Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services· Posey County, IN· Professional services· Sep 17, 2024 – Dec 17, 2025· 12FPC324F0220
  3. Under Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services· Dickinson County, MI· Professional services· Mar 2, 2026 – Mar 2, 2026· 12FPC126F0023
  4. Forest Service· Dickinson County, MI· Construction & real property· Jun 8, 2026 – Jun 8, 2026· 12445526C0025

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $131.9K (4 subawards)

2 primes

  1. ARLINGTON, VA · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $497.4K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $859.6K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $284.6K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $612.6K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $319.3K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $131.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $2.7M reported

  1. ENGLEWOOD, CO · 29 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DDK ENGINEERING - JOINT VENTURE$673.7K−48% in FY2026
    RANDOLPH, VT · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveUnder Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. DALLAS, TX · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SHAWNEE SURVEY & CONSULTING INC$604.2K+106% in FY2026
    VIENNA, IL · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.