Federal contractor · SIGNAL HILL, CA

COMMAND PERFORMANCE CONSTRUCTORS INC

COMMAND PERFORMANCE CONSTRUCTORS INC received $5.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+78% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $45.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($5.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$5.8M
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
H7NMEFM7N7E3
Parent company
COMMAND PERFORMANCE CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
Small businessMinority-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $5.8M in FY2026 together.

  1. COMMAND PERFORMANCE CONSTRUCTORS INCSIGNAL HILL, CA · Family page
    $5.8M
  2. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.1MFY2017
  2. 7.9MFY2018
  3. 1.6MFY2019
  4. 4MFY2020
  5. 7.1MFY2021
  6. 1.7MFY2022
  7. 2.8MFY2023
  8. 5.7MFY2024
  9. 3.3MFY2025
  10. 5.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$5.8M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Construction & real property· Jan 29, 2026 – Feb 11, 2026· N6247326F0143
  2. Department of the Navy· Imperial County, CA· Construction & real property· Jun 27, 2025 – Mar 27, 2026· N6247325F0245
  3. Department of the Navy· Kings County, CA· Construction & real property· Apr 21, 2026 – Apr 21, 2026· N6247326F0306
  4. Department of the Navy· San Bernardino County, CA· Construction & real property· Apr 20, 2026 – Apr 20, 2026· N6247326F0286
  5. Department of the Navy· Kings County, CA· Construction & real property· Apr 21, 2026 – Apr 21, 2026· N6247326F0319

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $346.2K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. HONOLULU, HI · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $247.1K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.3M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $346.2K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $1.9M reported

  1. RIVERSIDE, CA · 2 subawards · Other specialty trade contractors
  2. HONOLULU, HI · 1 subaward · Utility system construction

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. JACKSONVILLE, FL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Highway, street, and bridge construction
  2. QUADRANT CONSTRUCTION INC$18.4M−95% in FY2026
    JACKSONVILLE, NC · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Highway, street, and bridge construction
  3. VLJM, LLC$16.5M−100% in FY2026
    OCEANSIDE, CA · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Highway, street, and bridge construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.