Federal contractor · AUBURN HILLS, MI

COMMERCIAL CONTRACTING CORP

COMMERCIAL CONTRACTING CORP received $526.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−98% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $49M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($526.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
$526.4K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
1.9%
UEI
TDP8BUMTB4V3
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 24.6MFY2024
  2. 23.8MFY2025
  3. 526.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$526.4K100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$526.4K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Miami County, IN$302.6K57%
  2. Macomb County, MI$213.8K41%
  3. Jefferson County, KY$10K1.9%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition1.9%
    US 39% · $10K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions1.9%
    US 8.8% · $10K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. CONSTRUCT LOGISTICS READINESS COMPLEX (LRC) ON GRISSOM AIR RESERVE BASE, INDIANA.$25.9M
    Department of the Army· Miami County, IN· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2024 – Jun 12, 2026· W912QR24C0039
  2. MANNED/UNMANNED TACTICAL VEHICLE LAB PROJECT AT DETROIT ARSENAL IN WARREN, MI$23.7M
    Department of the Army· Macomb County, MI· Construction & real property· Aug 28, 2025 – Apr 15, 2026· W912QR25C0020
  3. INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) DESIGN BUILD AND DESIGN BID BUILD MULTIPLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT (MATOC) TO SUPPORT CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ENERGY RESILIENCE AND CONSERVATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM (ERCIP) NATIONWIDE.$10K
    Department of the Army· Jefferson County, KY· Construction & real property· Apr 17, 2026 – Apr 17, 2026· W912QR26FA106

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. JV JOC GERMANY BMS$49.1M+7.2% in FY2026
    GOLDBACH, DEU · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  2. NAKASATO CONTRACTING LLC$48.4M−86% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  3. YEAJIN E&C CO.,LTD.$50.5M−52% in FY2026
    DAEGU, KOR · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.