Federal contractor · COLORADO SPRINGS, CO

COMPUTER ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

COMPUTER ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC received $1.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($1.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.9M
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
Z9LTLYKJ3NN6
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$1.9M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Exclusions in SAM.gov

Records of the SAM.gov exclusions list (parties debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment or otherwise excluded) matched to this recipient by its Unique Entity ID or CAGE code.

  • Suspended or proposed for debarment
    No longer listed since Nov 1, 2022
    Excluding agency
    Department of the Air Force
    In effect from
    Apr 26, 2022 – Indefinite
    Program
    Reciprocal
    Matched by
    Unique Entity ID

SAM.gov lists what agencies report, and only exclusions in effect: those that ended are known from twice-yearly snapshots, so an end date is approximate. Agencies may award to an excluded party with a documented compelling reason. An exclusion is an administrative measure, not a conviction.

Source: Exclusions (debarred, suspended and otherwise excluded parties) (U.S. General Services Administration, SAM.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 4, 2026 · Exclusions as listed on Oct 3, 2026, history from Apr 28, 2022.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· El Paso County, CO· Research & development· Apr 8, 2026 – Apr 20, 2026· FA254126CB018

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KINETICS, INC.$2M−29% in FY2026
    BINGEN, WA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. DELAWARE, OH · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. HEROICA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$2.2M−88% in FY2026
    BROWNSVILLE, TX · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Computer Access Technologies, LLCAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$50K
3 reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$50K
    3 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations3 reports
  2. Defense3 reports
  3. Homeland security3 reports
  4. Intelligence and surveillance3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES3 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE3 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. PASSAGE CONSULTING GROUP LLC$50K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.