Federal contractor · CLINTON, MS

CONTROL CONCEPTS LLC

CONTROL CONCEPTS LLC received $1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+7.6% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $5.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
VRJFNL4XD9N5
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 628.7KFY2021
  2. 1.1MFY2022
  3. 823.4KFY2023
  4. 662.5KFY2024
  5. 947.6KFY2025
  6. 1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$665.8K65%
  2. Equipment maintenance$319.8K31%
  3. Construction & real property$33.9K3.3%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Hinds County, MS· Facilities & utilities· Dec 4, 2025 – Dec 4, 2025· W912HZ26FA014
  2. Department of the Army· Hinds County, MS· Equipment maintenance· Feb 6, 2026 – Feb 6, 2026· W912HZ26FA054
  3. Department of the Army· Hinds County, MS· Facilities & utilities· Mar 18, 2026 – Mar 18, 2026· W912HZ26FA070
  4. Department of the Army· Hinds County, MS· Construction & real property· Feb 24, 2026 – Feb 24, 2026· W912HZ26FA063
  5. Department of the Army· Hinds County, MS· Facilities & utilities· May 5, 2026 – May 5, 2026· W912HZ26FA097
  6. Department of the Army· Hinds County, MS· Equipment maintenance· Dec 17, 2025 – Dec 17, 2025· W912HZ26FA023

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ARLINGTON, TX · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance
  2. STROUDSBURG, PA · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance
  3. MELBOURNE, FL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.