Federal contractor · DANVERS, MA

COPYRIGHT CLEARANCE CENTER, INC.

COPYRIGHT CLEARANCE CENTER, INC. received $84K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−58% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.7M. Its largest customer was National Transportation Safety Board ($49.9K).

Obligations · FY2026: $84K
New awards: 2
Sole-source: 41%
Single offer: 0.0%

UEI: KMWMT67AYEM3

Other than small businessNonprofit

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

643.7KFY2017
800.6KFY2018
555.1KFY2019
564.7KFY2020
326.5KFY2021
151.7KFY2022
192.1KFY2023
193KFY2024
200.8KFY2025
84KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

National Transportation Safety Board$49.9K59%
1 awards
Department of the Army$34.1K41%
1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

IT & telecom$49.9K59%
Other equipment & supplies$34.1K41%

Where the work was performed

Cook County, IL$49.9K59%
Leavenworth County, KS$34.1K41%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Low competition41%
US 39% · $34.1K
Sole-source awards41%
US 30% · $34.1K
Single-offer competitions0.0%
US 8.7% · $0
Urgency justifications0.0%
US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

Department of the Army$34.1K
Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

ONLINE LIBRARY SUBSCRIPTION$49.9K
National Transportation Safety Board· Cook County, IL· IT & telecom· Sep 30, 2026 – Sep 30, 2026· 9531BM26P0052
PROVIDES COPYRIGHT PERMISSIONS FOR THE USE OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTED WORKS IN CGSC CURRICULUM. THE ANNUAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE PROVIDES COMPREHENSIVE COPYRIGHT PERMISSIONS FOR THE ACADEMIC USE OF COPYRIGHT$34.1K
Department of the Army· Leavenworth County, KS· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 28, 2026 – Jan 28, 2026· W91QF426FA016

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

Assistance · FY2026: $0
New awards: 0
Actions: 0
Since FY2021: $145.6K

Assistance by fiscal year

145.6KFY2021
0FY2024
0FY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2025.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

Sub-contracts: $126K (1 subaward)

1 prime

FLUOR MARINE PROPULSION, LLC$126K100%
GREENVILLE, SC · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

FY2025: $0 paid out · $118K received
FY2026: $0 paid out · $126K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $244K reported

FLUOR MARINE PROPULSION, LLC$244K
GREENVILLE, SC · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

GEMG GC VEHICLE I LLC$71.5K−100% in FY2026
WASHINGTON, DC · 15% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Web search portals, libraries, archives, and other information services
RANE NETWORK INC.$583K−80% in FY2026
NEW YORK, NY · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Web search portals, libraries, archives, and other information servicesNavy · Web search portals, libraries, archives, and other information services
ITHAKA HARBORS INC.$667.5K+13% in FY2026
NEW YORK, NY · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Web search portals, libraries, archives, and other information servicesArmy · Web search portals, libraries, archives, and other information servicesAir Force · Web search portals, libraries, archives, and other information services+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

Lobbying · 2025: $120K; 4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026: $330K

Lobbying by year

2023$30K
1 reports
2024$120K
4 reports
2025$120K
4 reports
2026$60K
2 reports

Top issues

Who was contacted

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES11 reports
U.S. SENATE11 reports
Office of Science & Technology Policy (OSTP)1 reports
White House Office1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

Radius Advocacy, LLC$330K
11 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

H.R. 7913 · Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act of 20241 report
118th Congress · Introduced · 2024
H.R. 1927 · CLEAR Act of 20251 report
119th Congress · Introduced · 2026
S. 114 · CLEAR Act of 20251 report
119th Congress · Introduced · 2026
S. 2455 · TRAIN Act1 report
119th Congress · Introduced · 2026

2 of 11 reports (2023–2026) name at least one bill. Bills and resolutions the current reports name in their issue descriptions, by number of reports. A report names what it lobbied on, not which side it took.

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.