Federal contractor · GRAND FORKS, ND

COUNTY OF GRAND FORKS

No contract obligations recorded for COUNTY OF GRAND FORKS in FY2026. Since FY2024: $10.4M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
ENQRDM3A5B17
Other than small businessGovernment entity
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $0 in FY2026 together.

  1. COUNTY OF GRAND FORKSGRAND FORKS, ND · Family page
    $0
  2. GRAND FORKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTERGRAND FORKS, ND
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6MFY2024
  2. 4.4MFY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for COUNTY OF GRAND FORKS in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

COUNTY OF GRAND FORKS received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards), −100% vs FY2025.

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$26M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 13.7MFY2021
  2. 100KFY2022
  3. 11.6MFY2024
  4. 600KFY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2025.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $1.1M (6 subawards)

2 primes

  1. NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF$563.1K52%
    BISMARCK, ND · 3 subawards
  2. NORTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES$514K48%
    BISMARCK, ND · 3 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.9M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $567.4K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $2.3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $971.5K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $257.5K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $7M reported

  1. NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF$6.5M
    BISMARCK, ND · 45 subawards
  2. NORTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES$514K
    BISMARCK, ND · 3 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TELEMUS GROUP LLC$8.7M−24% in FY2026
    MC LEAN, VA · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveWashington Headquarters Services · Scientific research and development services
  2. BARON PUBLIC AFFAIRS LLC$6.9M−28% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveWashington Headquarters Services · Scientific research and development services
  3. LOCKWOOD HILLS FEDERAL LLC$18.1M−108% in FY2026
    HERNDON, VA · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveWashington Headquarters Services · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.