Federal contractor · POTEAU, OK

COUNTY OF LE FLORE

COUNTY OF LE FLORE received $56.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($56.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$56.6K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
YCUNY5R7VHV8
Other than small businessGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 56.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$56.6K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $56.6K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $56.6K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Le Flore County, OK· Construction & real property· Dec 5, 2025 – Dec 5, 2025· W912BV26PA014

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

COUNTY OF LE FLORE received -$91.6K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 2 actions (0 new awards). Its largest program was 10.665 · Schools and Roads - Grants to States (-$91.6K).

Assistance · FY2026
-$91.6K
New awards
0
Actions
2
Since FY2021
$11.6M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 9.7MFY2021
  2. 2MFY2022
  3. -91.6KFY2026

By type

  1. Other assistance-$91.6K0.0%

Top programs

  1. 10.665 · Schools and Roads - Grants to States-$91.6K0.0%

Largest awards

  1. 10.665 · Schools and Roads - Grants to States· Forest Service· Other financial assistance· Feb 5, 2026 – Feb 5, 2026· 20RO11080900212

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $24.3K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $56.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $80.5K reported

  1. OK DEPT OF EMERGENCY MGMT$80.5K
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 2 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SACRAMENTO, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Utility system construction
  2. YUBA CITY, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Utility system construction
  3. KIRKLAND, WA · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Utility system construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.