Federal contractor · GRAND JUNCTION, CO

COUNTY OF MESA

No contract obligations recorded for COUNTY OF MESA in FY2026. Since FY2017: $497.1K. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($0). It also received $7.4M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
J4JZWDMQP351
Other than small businessGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 20KFY2017
  2. 19.7KFY2018
  3. 19.6KFY2019
  4. 106.7KFY2020
  5. 91KFY2021
  6. 50.3KFY2022
  7. 75KFY2023
  8. 82.8KFY2024
  9. 32KFY2025
  10. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Land Management· Mesa County, CO· Professional services· Sep 9, 2025 – Dec 30, 2025· 140L1725P0063

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

COUNTY OF MESA received $7.4M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 17 actions (6 new awards), +11% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 20.507 · Federal Transit Formula Grants ($3.2M).

Assistance · FY2026
$7.4M
New awards
6
Actions
17
Since FY2021
$71.7M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 32.8MFY2021
  2. 7.8MFY2022
  3. 8MFY2023
  4. 9MFY2024
  5. 6.7MFY2025
  6. 7.4MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$7.4M99.9%
  2. Other assistance$5,0050.1%

Top programs

  1. 20.507 · Federal Transit Formula Grants$3.2M44%
  2. 20.933 · National Infrastructure Investments$3.2M43%
  3. 95.001 · High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program$441.9K5.9%
  4. 10.923 · Emergency Watershed Protection Program$362.8K4.9%
  5. 20.939 · Safe Streets and Roads for All$196K2.6%
  6. 15.225 · Recreation and Visitor Services$35K0.5%
  7. 10.704 · Law Enforcement Agreements$5,0050.1%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Transportation
  2. Department of Transportation
  3. Office of the National Drug Control Policy$441.9K5.9%
    Executive Office of the President
  4. Department of Agriculture
  5. Department of the Interior
  6. Forest Service$5,0050.1%
    Department of Agriculture

Largest awards

  1. 20.526 · Buses and Bus Facilities Formula, Competitive, and Low or No Emissions Programs· Federal Transit Administration· Project grant· Sep 9, 2024 – Mar 5, 2026· CO-2024-037
  2. 20.933 · National Infrastructure Investments· Federal Highway Administration· Project grant· Feb 4, 2026 – Feb 4, 2026· 693JJ32640363
  3. 20.507 · Federal Transit Formula Grants· Federal Transit Administration· Formula grant· Mar 16, 2026 – Mar 16, 2026· CO-2026-008
  4. 20.507 · Federal Transit Formula Grants· Federal Transit Administration· Formula grant· Jul 22, 2024 – Sep 24, 2026· CO-2024-023
  5. 20.507 · Federal Transit Formula Grants· Federal Transit Administration· Formula grant· May 10, 2023 – Sep 24, 2026· CO-2023-017
  6. 95.001 · High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program· Office of the National Drug Control Policy· Grant· Jul 6, 2026 – Jul 6, 2026· HID2526G0702

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $3.9M (20 subawards)

5 primes

  1. DENVER, CO · 10 subawards
  2. DENVER, CO · 2 subawards
  3. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY$702.3K18%
    DENVER, CO · 6 subawards
  4. DENVER, CO · 1 subaward
  5. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION$69K1.8%
    DENVER, CO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $4.8M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $6.7M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $5.6M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $18.6M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $19M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $3.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

10 companies · $58.5M reported

  1. DENVER, CO · 30 subawards
  2. DENVER, CO · 64 subawards
  3. DENVER, CO · 13 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LAS VEGAS, NV · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Justice, public order, and safety activities
  2. COUNTY OF FRANKLIN$63K+2.1% in FY2026
    PASCO, WA · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Justice, public order, and safety activities
  3. SAN JUAN COUNTY$165K+33% in FY2026
    AZTEC, NM · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Justice, public order, and safety activities

Showing the top 3 of 10 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.