Federal contractor · COUNCIL GROVE, KS

COUNTY OF MORRIS

COUNTY OF MORRIS received $27K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−3.5% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $251.5K. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($27K).

Obligations · FY2026
$27K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
E8Z7Q7FKKB86
Other than small businessGovernment entity
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 21.5KFY2017
  2. 22.4KFY2018
  3. 23.7KFY2019
  4. 24.9KFY2020
  5. 24.9KFY2021
  6. 25.6KFY2022
  7. 26.4KFY2023
  8. 27.1KFY2024
  9. 28KFY2025
  10. 27KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$27K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$27K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Hamilton County, NE$27K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $27K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $27K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Army$27K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT NEW ADV FOR MORRIS CO AT COUNCIL GROVE LAKE$27K
    Department of the Army· Hamilton County, NE· Facilities & utilities· Mar 26, 2026 – Mar 26, 2026· W912BV26PA043

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

COUNTY OF MORRIS received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$1.2M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 1.1MFY2021
  2. 100KFY2022

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2022.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $316.4K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $80.5K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $396.9K reported

  1. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION$238.4K
    TOPEKA, KS · 6 subawards
  2. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS$83.8K
    TOPEKA, KS · 1 subaward
  3. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT$74.7K
    TOPEKA, KS · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. VALLEY COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE$81.9K−69% in FY2026
    GLASGOW, MT · 99.8% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Justice, public order, and safety activities
  2. COUNTY OF MOULTRIE$82.6K−28% in FY2026
    SULLIVAN, IL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Justice, public order, and safety activities
  3. COUNTY OF STONE$80.6K−37% in FY2026
    GALENA, MO · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Justice, public order, and safety activities

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.