Federal contractor · NAPA, CA
COUNTY OF NAPA
No contract obligations recorded for COUNTY OF NAPA in FY2026. Since FY2017: $2.1M.
- Obligations · FY2026
- $0
- New awards
- 0
- Sole-source
- —
- Single offer
- —
- UEI
- KR72JKPXA7V1
- Parent company
- COUNTY OF NAPA
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $0 in FY2026 together.
- COUNTY OF NAPANAPA, CA · Family page$0
- COUNTY OF NAPANAPA, CA$0
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 382.1KFY2017
- 393.7KFY2018
- 257.1KFY2021
- 264.8KFY2022
- 272.7KFY2023
- 280.9KFY2024
- 289.3KFY2025
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
No contract obligations recorded for COUNTY OF NAPA in FY2026.
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
Where the work was performed
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
7 companies · $160.4M reported
- DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES CALIFORNIA$96.3MSACRAMENTO, CA · 71 subawards
- SACRAMENTO, CA · 18 subawards
- MATHER, CA · 38 subawards
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- COUNTY OF CALAVERAS$954.9K+51% in FY2026SAN ANDREAS, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Reclamation · Justice, public order, and safety activities
- COUNTY OF HILL$86.1K+4% in FY2026HAVRE, MT · 15% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Reclamation · Justice, public order, and safety activities
- COUNTY OF LEWIS & CLARK$71.1K−167% in FY2026HELENA, MT · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Reclamation · Justice, public order, and safety activities
Showing the top 3 of 7 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Lobbying and PAC activity
Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.
Across the company family of COUNTY OF NAPA (2 recipients).
Matched organizations
- County of NapaAI match · 99%
- The County of Napa, CaliforniaAI match · 99%
- Lobbying · 2025
- $165K
- 4 reports
- Lobbying · 2023–2026
- $555K
Lobbying by year
- 2023$160K4 reports
- 2024$200K4 reports
- 2025$165K4 reports
- 2026$30K2 reports
Top issues
- Transportation14 reports
- Urban development and municipalities11 reports
- Disaster planning and emergencies3 reports
- Insurance3 reports
- Welfare3 reports
Who was contacted
- U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
- U.S. SENATE14 reports
- Executive Office of the President (EOP)11 reports
- Transportation - Dept of (DOT)11 reports
Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).
Lobbying firms hired
- PLATINUM ADVISORS DC, LLC$510K11 reports
- Paragon Government Relations$45K3 reports
Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.
Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.
Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.
Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.
Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.