Federal contractor · REDWOOD CITY, CA

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO received $21K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (+32% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $135.2K. Its largest customer was U.S. Secret Service ($21K).

Obligations · FY2026
$21K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
HKUWFVADCLM4
Parent company
SAN MATEO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
Other than small businessGovernment entity
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the COUNTY OF SAN MATEO company family: 6 registered entities, $21K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. COUNTY OF SAN MATEOREDWOOD CITY, CA · Family page
    $0
  2. SAN MATEO CO DEPT OF PUREDWOOD CITY, CA
    $0
  3. SAN MATEO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSINGREDWOOD CITY, CA
    $0
  4. SAN MATEO, COUNTY OFSAN MATEO, CA
    $0
  5. SAN MATEO, COUNTY OFSAN MATEO, CA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 12.6KFY2017
  2. 12.9KFY2018
  3. 13.3KFY2019
  4. 0FY2020
  5. 14.2KFY2021
  6. 14.6KFY2022
  7. 15KFY2023
  8. 15.5KFY2024
  9. 16KFY2025
  10. 21KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. U.S. Secret Service$21K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$21K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. San Mateo County, CA$21K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $21K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $21K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ANTENNA SITE LEASE$21K
    U.S. Secret Service· San Mateo County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2025 – Mar 22, 2026· 70US0925C70094094

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2022
$980K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 0FY2022
  2. -20KFY2023
  3. 1MFY2024
  4. 0FY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2022–FY2025.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

35 companies · $22.7M reported

  1. ABODE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT$5.4M
    FREMONT, CA · 4 subawards
  2. LIFEMOVES$4.1M
    SANTA CLARA, CA · 17 subawards
  3. LINC HOUSING CORP$2M
    LONG BEACH, CA · 4 subawards

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $34.9M reported

  1. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CALIFORNIA$13.4M
    SACRAMENTO, CA · 9 subawards
  2. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$7.8M
    SACRAMENTO, CA · 5 subawards
  3. OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES$6.8M
    MATHER, CA · 12 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WDEF-TV, INC.$54.4K+92% in FY2026
    SAVANNAH, GA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Secret Service · Lessors of real estate
  2. DIAMOND COMMUNICATIONS LLC$58.1K+232% in FY2026
    SPRINGFIELD, NJ · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Secret Service · Lessors of real estate
  3. FOREST HILL LANE, LLC$62.1K+32% in FY2026
    NEW SMYRNA BEACH, FL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Secret Service · Lessors of real estate

Showing the top 3 of 24 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.