Federal contractor · VISALIA, CA

COUNTY OF TULARE

COUNTY OF TULARE received $152.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+3% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($152.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$152.5K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FZLTWQEMATQ4
Other than small businessGovernment entity

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $152.5K in FY2026 together.

  1. COUNTY OF TULAREVISALIA, CA · Family page
    $152.5K
  2. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 103.3KFY2017
  2. 114.7KFY2018
  3. 113.4KFY2019
  4. 125.4KFY2020
  5. 48KFY2021
  6. 135.5KFY2022
  7. 93.5KFY2023
  8. 133.6KFY2024
  9. 148.1KFY2025
  10. 152.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$152.5K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $152.5K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $152.5K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Tulare County, CA· Professional services· Apr 12, 2022 – Mar 12, 2026· W9123822P0022
  2. Department of the Army· Tulare County, CA· Professional services· Apr 5, 2022 – Mar 3, 2026· W9123822P0017

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

COUNTY OF TULARE received -$142.3K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1 actions (0 new awards). Its largest program was 16.590 · Grants to Encourage Arrest Policies and Enforcement of Protection Orders Program (-$142.3K).

Assistance · FY2026
-$142.3K
New awards
0
Actions
1
Since FY2021
$118.2M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 104.5MFY2021
  2. 12.8MFY2022
  3. 1MFY2023
  4. 57KFY2024
  5. -142.3KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants-$142.3K0.0%

Top programs

  1. 16.590 · Grants to Encourage Arrest Policies and Enforcement of Protection Orders Program-$142.3K0.0%

Largest awards

  1. 16.590 · Grants to Encourage Arrest Policies and Enforcement of Protection Orders Program· Offices, Boards and Divisions· Project grant· Apr 22, 2026 – Apr 22, 2026· 2017WEAX0005

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $113.2M (22 subawards)

4 primes

  1. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES CALIFORNIA$109.9M97%
    SACRAMENTO, CA · 10 subawards
  2. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$1.6M1.4%
    SACRAMENTO, CA · 2 subawards
  3. MATHER, CA · 9 subawards
  4. CALIFORNIA BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS$375.8K0.3%
    SACRAMENTO, CA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $21.4M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $21.2M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $85.9M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $111.7M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $118.7M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $113.2M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

8 companies · $472.1M reported

  1. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES CALIFORNIA$392.1M
    SACRAMENTO, CA · 60 subawards
  2. SACRAMENTO, CA · 21 subawards
  3. MATHER, CA · 83 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TEGUCIGALPA, HND · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Investigation and security services
  2. ELBA, AL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Investigation and security services
  3. STRATIGOS DYNAMICS, INC$472.2K−100% in FY2026
    DERIDDER, LA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Investigation and security services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of COUNTY OF TULARE (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • County of TulareAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$80K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$280K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$80K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$80K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$80K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$40K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  2. Natural resources14 reports
  3. Health issues8 reports
  4. Transportation8 reports
  5. Clean air and water5 reports
  6. Homeland security4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES11 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE9 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. CARPI & CLAY, INC.$280K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.