Federal contractor · PHOENIX, AZ

CREATIVE ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS, L.L.C.

CREATIVE ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS, L.L.C. received $1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−43% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $17M. Its largest customer was District of Columbia Courts ($677.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
MLYGWA4C1RB8
Parent company
CREATIVE ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS, L.L.C.
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 182.3KFY2017
  2. 148.8KFY2018
  3. 143KFY2019
  4. 644.3KFY2020
  5. 2.5MFY2021
  6. 2.7MFY2022
  7. 4.9MFY2023
  8. 2.9MFY2024
  9. 1.8MFY2025
  10. 1MFY2026
  11. 0FY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$1.1M99%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$7,1750.7%

Where the work was performed

  1. Pima County, AZ$7,1750.7%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$27.5K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$27.4K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · -$143
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Pulaski County, MO· IT & telecom· Dec 31, 2020 – Jun 9, 2026· W911S721C0002
  2. District of Columbia Courts· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Aug 24, 2026 – Sep 29, 2026· 95C67826P0321
  3. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau· Maricopa County, AZ· Professional services· Sep 28, 2023 – Nov 7, 2025· 9531CB23F0109
  4. Office of the Inspector General· Maricopa County, AZ· Professional services· Sep 28, 2023 – Oct 28, 2025· 15G1AC23F00000071
  5. Department of the Air Force· Pima County, AZ· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 26, 2024 – Jan 16, 2026· FA487724F0219
  6. Office of the Inspector General· Maricopa County, AZ· Professional services· Jul 31, 2025 – Sep 28, 2026· 15G1AC25F00000058
  7. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau· Maricopa County, AZ· IT & telecom· May 9, 2024 – Oct 6, 2026· 9531CB24F0058

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $2M reported

  1. ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. INDIANAPOLIS, IN · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. DEWBERRY DESIGN-BUILDERS INC$3.3M−141% in FY2026
    RALEIGH, NC · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. SEI GROUP INC$3.4M−106% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.