Federal contractor · FORT THOMPSON, SD

CROW CREEK SIOUX TRIBE

CROW CREEK SIOUX TRIBE received $74.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+37% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $580K. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($62.8K). It also received $3.6M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$74.7K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
W83DYN8U2A21
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $74.7K in FY2026 together.

  1. CROW CREEK SIOUX TRIBEFORT THOMPSON, SD · Family page
    $74.7K
  2. CROW CREEK SIOUX TRIBEFORT THOMPSON, SD
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 51.8KFY2017
  2. 78.6KFY2018
  3. 43.4KFY2019
  4. 45.4KFY2020
  5. 37.8KFY2021
  6. 42.7KFY2022
  7. 33.9KFY2023
  8. 117.4KFY2024
  9. 54.4KFY2025
  10. 74.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$62.8K84%
    1 awards
  2. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education$11.9K16%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$74.7K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Buffalo County, SD$74.7K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $74.7K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $74.7K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Army$62.8K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education$11.9K
    Department of the Interior · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. THIS IS A NON-PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO NATURAL RESOURCE IMPROVEMENT SERVICES FOR THE BIG BEND PROJECT, FORT THOMPSON, SD. SERVICES INCLUDE PREPARATION AND PLANTING OF FOOD PLOTS AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF BOUNDARY FENCE.$62.8K
    Department of the Army· Buffalo County, SD· Facilities & utilities· Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· W9128F26PA025
  2. WASTE MANAGEMENT FOR CROW CREEK AGENCY$11.9K
    Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Buffalo County, SD· Facilities & utilities· Mar 6, 2026 – Jul 24, 2026· 140A0126C0007

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

CROW CREEK SIOUX TRIBE received $3.6M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 25 actions (16 new awards), +84% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 15.519 · Indian Tribal Water Resources Development, Management, and Protection ($1.4M).

Assistance · FY2026
$3.6M
New awards
16
Actions
25
Since FY2021
$43.7M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 29.4MFY2021
  2. 3.2MFY2022
  3. 4.2MFY2023
  4. 1.4MFY2024
  5. 1.9MFY2025
  6. 3.6MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$2.6M72%
  2. Direct payments$1M28%

Top programs

  1. 15.519 · Indian Tribal Water Resources Development, Management, and Protection$1.4M39%
  2. 15.034 · Agriculture on Indian Lands$664.2K19%
  3. 10.567 · Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations$523.2K15%
  4. 93.575 · Child Care and Development Block Grant$436.5K12%
  5. 15.032 · Indian Economic Development$141.5K4.0%
  6. 15.037 · Water Resources on Indian Lands$117.3K3.3%
  7. 93.047 · Special Programs for the Aging, Title Vi, Part A, Grants to Indian Tribes, Part B, Grants to Native Hawaiians$96.1K2.7%
  8. 15.020 · Aid to Tribal Governments$85K2.4%

Awarding agencies

  1. Bureau of Reclamation$1.4M39%
    Department of the Interior
  2. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education$1M28%
    Department of the Interior
  3. Food and Nutrition Service$523.2K15%
    Department of Agriculture
  4. Administration for Children and Families$515.4K14%
    Department of Health and Human Services
  5. Administration for Community Living$114.5K3.2%
    Department of Health and Human Services

Largest awards

  1. DESCRIPTION:THIS AGREEMENT PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CROW CREEK SIOUX TRIBE'S CONTINUING ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS WHILE…$1.6M
    66.605 · Performance Partnership Grants· Environmental Protection Agency· Formula grant· Sep 26, 2022 – Dec 4, 2025· 95812823
  2. UNDER THIS AGREEMENT THE CROW CREEK SIOUX TRIBE SHALL CONSTRUCT NEW STOCK DAMS AND DRILL NEW WELLS TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL WATER TO THE TRIBE…$500K
    15.519 · Indian Tribal Water Resources Development, Management, and Protection· Bureau of Reclamation· Grant· Aug 11, 2026 – Aug 11, 2026· R26AP00117
  3. UNDER THIS AGREEMENT THE CROW CREEK SIOUX TRIBE SHALL REPLACE EXISTING IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT THAT HAS EITHER REACHED THE END OF ITS USEFUL…$500K
    15.519 · Indian Tribal Water Resources Development, Management, and Protection· Bureau of Reclamation· Grant· Aug 10, 2026 – Aug 10, 2026· R26AP00116
  4. SNAP FDPIR SAE$454.1K
    10.567 · Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations· Food and Nutrition Service· Project grant· Dec 18, 2025 – Dec 18, 2025· 263SD209Q5206
  5. CCDD-2026 - CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT DISCRETIONARY$436.5K
    93.575 · Child Care and Development Block Grant· Administration for Children and Families· Block grant· Nov 20, 2025 – Jul 24, 2026· 26PLSDCCDD
  6. CCDD-2023$428.1K
    93.575 · Child Care and Development Block Grant· Administration for Children and Families· Block grant· Oct 28, 2022 – Dec 15, 2025· 23PLSDCCDD

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $30K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SOUTH DAKOTA$30K100%
    PIERRE, SD · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $120K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $30K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $150K reported

  1. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SOUTH DAKOTA$150K
    PIERRE, SD · 3 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RES-RLH RIDGE CUT FARMS LLC$124.1K
    SACRAMENTO, CA · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Social advocacy organizations
  2. AMBER ANN MORRIS$92.8K+1.5% in FY2026
    OLYMPIA, WA · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Social advocacy organizations
  3. CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS CAPACITACION Y ANALISIS EN DERECHOS HUMANOS$294K−100% in FY2026
    LA TRINIDAD DE MORAVIA, CRI · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Social advocacy organizations

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of CROW CREEK SIOUX TRIBE (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Crow Creek Sioux TribeAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2024
$0
1 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2024
$30K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$30K
    3 reports
  2. 2024$0
    1 reports

Top issues

  1. Indian and Native American affairs2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. Justice - Dept of (DOJ)2 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES2 reports
  3. U.S. SENATE2 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. BIG FIRE LAW & POLICY GROUP, LLP$30K
    4 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.