Federal contractor · FREDERICK, MD

CROWLEY MICROGRAPHICS, INC.

CROWLEY MICROGRAPHICS, INC. received $429.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 11 awards (−16% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $8M. Its largest customer was National Archives and Records Administration ($215K).

Obligations · FY2026
$429.7K
New awards
11
Sole-source
12%
Single offer
26%
UEI
FVMFJ6B8UN15
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 637.7KFY2017
  2. 1.2MFY2018
  3. 169.4KFY2019
  4. 894.6KFY2020
  5. 1.4MFY2021
  6. 941.3KFY2022
  7. 1.2MFY2023
  8. 683.7KFY2024
  9. 509.5KFY2025
  10. 429.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. National Archives and Records Administration$215K50%
    2 awards
  2. National Gallery of Art$84.6K20%
    1 awards
  3. U.S. Geological Survey$30K7.0%
    1 awards
  4. Bureau of Land Management$28.1K6.5%
    1 awards
  5. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Acquisition and Property Management Division$27.4K6.4%
    1 awards
  6. Bureau of Reclamation$20.7K4.8%
    1 awards
  7. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission$12K2.8%
    1 awards
  8. Department of the Navy$12K2.8%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$341.6K79%
  2. IT & telecom$60.1K14%
  3. Equipment maintenance$28.1K6.5%

Where the work was performed

  1. Frederick County, MD$369K86%
  2. Fairfax County, VA$28.1K6.5%
  3. Sacramento County, CA$20.7K4.8%
  4. District of Columbia, DC$12K2.8%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition38%
    US 39% · $164K
  • Sole-source awards12%
    US 30% · $52K
  • Single-offer competitions26%
    US 8.8% · $112K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$12K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission$12K
    Department of Energy · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. DIGITIZATION OF MICROFILM HOLDINGS$630.3K
    National Archives and Records Administration· Frederick County, MD· Professional services· Nov 29, 2023 – Aug 10, 2026· 88310324F00033
  2. DIGITIZATION OF ACCESSIONED MICROFILM HOLDINGS$531.1K
    National Archives and Records Administration· Frederick County, MD· Professional services· Sep 29, 2022 – Feb 17, 2026· 88310322F00272
  3. BASE YEAR C400 APERTURE CARD SCANNER MAINTENANCE WITH TWO OPTION YEARS.$128.7K
    Department of the Navy· Frederick County, MD· IT & telecom· Jul 30, 2024 – Jun 1, 2026· N6893624P0331
  4. DIGITIZATION SERVICES.$84.6K
    National Gallery of Art· Frederick County, MD· Professional services· Aug 19, 2026 – Aug 19, 2026· 33301126FSS0060
  5. ZEUTSCHEL SCANNER MAINTENANCE (OST/ITSMD)$82.2K
    Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Acquisition and Property Management Division· Frederick County, MD· IT & telecom· Aug 15, 2024 – May 20, 2026· 15A00024PAQA00217
  6. SCANNER MAINTENANCE FOR ZEUTSCHELS$58.6K
    Bureau of Land Management· Fairfax County, VA· Equipment maintenance· Sep 16, 2025 – Aug 27, 2026· 140L0125P0035
  7. SCANNING, OCR DIGITIZATION, AND PDF CONVERSION OF APPROXIMATELY 450 ARCHIVAL BOXES CONTAINING APOLLO-ERA AND HISTORICAL ASTROGEOLOGY RECORDS, INCLUDING RETURN OF ORIGINAL MATERIALS AND DELIVERY OF DIGITIZED FILES.$30K
    U.S. Geological Survey· Frederick County, MD· Professional services· Aug 14, 2026 – Aug 14, 2026· 140G0326F0062
  8. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUIREMENT IS TO ACQUIRE AN APERTURE CARD SCANNER AND SUPPORT SERVICES TO CONVERT APERTURE CARD RECORDS INTO DIGITAL FORMAT FOR PRESERVATION, RETRIEVAL, AND ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT.$20.7K
    Bureau of Reclamation· Sacramento County, CA· IT & telecom· Jul 1, 2026 – Jul 1, 2026· 140R2026P0062

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.2M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $38.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $2.9M reported

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$2.7M
    MELBOURNE, FL · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. TRIAD NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC$202.9K
    COLUMBUS, OH · 2 subawards · Facilities support services
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$38.8K
    TUCSON, AZ · 1 subaward · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 19 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. INTERNET ARCHIVE$475K+81% in FY2026
    SAN FRANCISCO, CA · 16% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Archives and Records Administration · Data processing, hosting, and related services
  2. QUALITY ASSOCIATES, INC.$984.5K−54% in FY2026
    FULTON, MD · 13% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Archives and Records Administration · Data processing, hosting, and related servicesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Data processing, hosting, and related servicesNavy · Data processing, hosting, and related services
  3. AUDIO VISUAL ONE LTD$201.1K−29% in FY2026
    SCHILLER PARK, IL · 8.5% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Data processing, hosting, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.