Federal contractor · EL SEGUNDO, CA

CX2, INC.

CX2, INC. received $806.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($660K).

Obligations · FY2026
$806.2K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
82%
UEI
C2LKR6FD8JK7
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 806.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$806.2K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition82%
    US 39% · $660K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions82%
    US 8.8% · $660K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Los Angeles County, CA· Research & development· Apr 24, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026· W911NF26CA013
  2. Department of the Air Force· Los Angeles County, CA· Research & development· Mar 24, 2026 – Mar 24, 2026· FA238526PB009

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BAKER ENGINEERING, LLC$849.2K+87% in FY2026
    NUNICA, MI · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • CX2, INC.AI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$209K
10 reports
Lobbying · 2024–2026
$377K
$377K in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2024$40K
    3 reports
  2. 2025$209K
    10 reports
  3. 2026$128K
    6 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense19 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE19 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES18 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. ANCHOR & ARROW STRATEGIES$150K
    6 reports
  2. ANCHOR & ARROW LLC$60K
    2 reports
  3. ATS Communications, inc. (DBA Silbey Strategies)$0
    4 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.