Federal contractor · BROKEN ARROW, OK

CYMSTAR LLC

CYMSTAR LLC received $32.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−34% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $503M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($33.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$32.6M
New awards
7
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
11%
UEI
FM7GT4YQQAN1
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedHUBZone firm
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $32.6M in FY2026 together.

  1. CYMSTAR LLCBROKEN ARROW, OK · Family page
    $32.6M
  2. CYMSTAR SERVICES LLCBROKEN ARROW, OK
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 10.8MFY2017
  2. 24.1MFY2018
  3. 63.1MFY2019
  4. 52MFY2020
  5. 67.3MFY2021
  6. 48.6MFY2022
  7. 64.4MFY2023
  8. 90.9MFY2024
  9. 49.3MFY2025
  10. 32.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$33.1M100%
    5 awards
  2. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards
  3. Department of the Navy-$527.6K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$28.9M89%
  2. Professional services$3.6M11%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$113.7K0.3%
  4. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Tulsa County, OK$32.6M100.0%
  2. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition11%
    US 39% · $3.7M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions11%
    US 8.8% · $3.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. TRAINING SYSTEM ACQUISITIONS III TASK ORDER, C-5 AIR CREW TRAINING SYSTEM.$267.8M
    Department of the Air Force· Tulsa County, OK· Equipment maintenance· Sep 11, 2017 – Apr 30, 2026· FA862117F6255
  2. A-10 AIRCREW TRAINING SYSTEM$123.8M
    Department of the Air Force· Tulsa County, OK· Equipment maintenance· Jul 31, 2020 – May 27, 2026· FA862120F6259
  3. E-4B TRAINING SYSTEM DEVICE$25.7M
    Department of the Air Force· Tulsa County, OK· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 14, 2020 – Jun 12, 2026· FA862120F6264
  4. THE C-5 TRAINING SYSTEM (TS) PROGRAM IS COMPOSED OF TWO ELEMENTS: C-5 AIRCREW TRAINING SYSTEM (ATS) AND THE C-5 MAINTENANCE TRAINING SYSTEM (MTS). THE C-5 TS CONTRACT IS FOR THE DELIVERY OF SUPPLIES AND NONPERSONAL SERVICES SPECIFIED IN THE PWS.$19.4M
    Department of the Air Force· Tulsa County, OK· Equipment maintenance· Sep 12, 2025 – Apr 30, 2026· FA862125FB018
  5. THE REQUIREMENT WILL MODERNIZE SEVEN MARINE COMMON AIRCREW TRAINER (MCAT) DEVICES (2H166A-3, 2H166A-5, 2H166B-1, 2H166A-1, 2H166A-6, 2H166A-2, AND 2H166A-4), RELOCATE DEVICE 2H166A-2 AND PROCURE THREE MONTHS OF CONTRACTOR LOGISTIC SUPPORT (CLS).$16.8M
    Department of the Navy· Tulsa County, OK· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 19, 2024 – Apr 14, 2026· N6134024F0124
  6. E4B TRAINING SYSTEM CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT$3.6M
    Department of the Air Force· Tulsa County, OK· Professional services· May 22, 2026 – May 22, 2026· FA862126FB005
  7. SCALABLE HOMELAND INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISE LAYERED DEFENSE (SHIELD) INITIAL ORDER.$500
    Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ085926FF969

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $5.1M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $580.8K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $181.5K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $5.2M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $12.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $23.6M reported

  1. CAE USA INC.$23.6M
    ARLINGTON, TX · 10 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ATEC INC$181.1M−67% in FY2026
    STAFFORD, TX · 3 entities · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. SOURCE ONE SPARES LLC$132.4M−53% in FY2026
    HOUSTON, TX · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. ATAP INC$152M+8.4% in FY2026
    EASTABOGA, AL · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.