Federal contractor · FORT WASHINGTON, MD

DADE STAR GROUP, LLC

DADE STAR GROUP, LLC received $99.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+36% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $268.1K. Its largest customer was Public Buildings Service ($99.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$99.6K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
MMJWDKLUAFL3
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 87.4KFY2017
  2. 8KFY2022
  3. 73KFY2025
  4. 99.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Public Buildings Service$99.6K100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$99.6K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. District of Columbia, DC$99.6K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $99.6K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $99.6K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Public Buildings Service$99.6K
    General Services Administration · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. OVERHEAD LIGHTING INSTALLATION$99.6K
    Public Buildings Service· District of Columbia, DC· Construction & real property· Feb 6, 2026 – Jun 29, 2026· 47PE5526C0004
  2. INSTALLATION OF LIGHTED SIGN AT THE US SECRET SERVICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC$73K
    Public Buildings Service· District of Columbia, DC· Construction & real property· Sep 29, 2025 – Jul 31, 2026· 47PM0425C0020

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $149.9K (3 subawards)

3 sub-recipients

  1. K & E ELECTRIC, INC.$76.6K51%
    FORT WASHINGTON, MD · 1 subaward
  2. RIDGEVIEW GLASS INC$52.9K35%
    UPPER MARLBORO, MD · 1 subaward
  3. EB ENTERPRISES LLC$20.4K14%
    ACCOKEEK, MD · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 150% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

3 companies · $149.9K reported

  1. K & E ELECTRIC, INC.$76.6K
    FORT WASHINGTON, MD · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  2. RIDGEVIEW GLASS INC$52.9K
    UPPER MARLBORO, MD · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  3. EB ENTERPRISES LLC$20.4K
    ACCOKEEK, MD · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY$181.9K
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Nonresidential building construction
  2. CRITICAL PATH SERVICES, INC.$162.6K
    MIAMI, FL · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Nonresidential building construction
  3. QUINN FREDERICK CORP$235.9K
    ADDISON, IL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.