Federal contractor · MISSOULA, MT

DALE FLANAGAN

DALE FLANAGAN received $268K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+26% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.8M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($268K).

Obligations · FY2026
$268K
New awards
4
Sole-source
32%
Single offer
68%
UEI
N3XLFG1L6JR1
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 0FY2017
  2. 567.5KFY2018
  3. 1.5KFY2019
  4. 262KFY2020
  5. 282KFY2021
  6. 864.6KFY2022
  7. 259KFY2023
  8. 89.8KFY2024
  9. 211.9KFY2025
  10. 268KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$268K100%
    4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$182.7K68%
  2. Equipment maintenance$85.3K32%

Where the work was performed

  1. Ravalli County, MT$240.4K90%
  2. Beaverhead County, MT$27.6K10%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $268K
  • Sole-source awards32%
    US 30% · $85.3K
  • Single-offer competitions68%
    US 8.7% · $182.7K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Forest Service$85.3K
    Department of Agriculture · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. DALE FLANAGAN MTBRF000340 E75$111.2K
    Forest Service· Ravalli County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 30, 2026 – Aug 30, 2026· 12024B26M1565
  2. E92, NATURE GROVE, MTBRF000340, FORW, FORWARDER;$85.3K
    Forest Service· Ravalli County, MT· Equipment maintenance· Aug 30, 2026 – Aug 30, 2026· 12034326K5080
  3. DALE FLANAGAN MTBRF000255 E45$43.8K
    Forest Service· Ravalli County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 3, 2026 – Aug 3, 2026· 1202SB26M1982
  4. DALE FLANAGAN MTBDF266293 E119$27.6K
    Forest Service· Beaverhead County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 25, 2026 – Aug 25, 2026· 1202SB26M2842

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GRIZZLY TIMBER LLC$567.6K−0.3% in FY2026
    SHERIDAN, MT · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryForest Service · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment rental and leasing
  2. PREMIER SERVICES & EQUIPMENT LLC$493K−8.8% in FY2026
    SCOTTS MILLS, OR · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestry
  3. KYLE LAWLESS$495.9K−17% in FY2026
    BAKERSFIELD, CA · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestry

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.