Federal contractor · FLORENCE, MT

DANIEL J MARTIN

DANIEL J MARTIN received $309.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+23% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.4M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($309.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$309.7K
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
NK1GRCJ1BEE5
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 0FY2017
  2. 82.8KFY2018
  3. 166KFY2020
  4. 80.2KFY2021
  5. 160.8KFY2022
  6. 63.3KFY2023
  7. 238.1KFY2024
  8. 251KFY2025
  9. 309.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$309.7K100%
    4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$309.7K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. St. Louis County, MN$185.3K60%
  2. Beaverhead County, MT$68.8K22%
  3. Teton County, WY$55.6K18%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $309.7K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $309.7K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. DANIEL J MARTIN MNSUF002394 E123$97.7K
    Forest Service· St. Louis County, MN· Facilities & utilities· Jul 20, 2026 – Jul 20, 2026· 1202SB26M2050
  2. DANIEL J MARTIN MNSUF002394 E73$87.6K
    Forest Service· St. Louis County, MN· Facilities & utilities· Jul 18, 2026 – Jul 18, 2026· 1202SB26M1927
  3. DANIEL J MARTIN MTBDF266313 E94$68.8K
    Forest Service· Beaverhead County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 10, 2026 – Aug 10, 2026· 1202SB26M2537
  4. DANIEL J MARTIN WYBTF002621 E19$55.6K
    Forest Service· Teton County, WY· Facilities & utilities· Aug 8, 2026 – Aug 8, 2026· 1202SB26M2754

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CRAIG DEWSNUP$805K−14% in FY2026
    GRIDLEY, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestry
  2. WESTERN WOOD PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION$812.6K−57% in FY2026
    PORTLAND, OR · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestry
  3. TRYWAYS INC$812.8K+11% in FY2026
    EAST WENATCHEE, WA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestry

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.