Federal contractor · SAN DIEGO, CA

DAV ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.

DAV ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC. received $22.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 105 awards (+39% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $103.4M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($21.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$22.8M
New awards
105
Sole-source
0.9%
Single offer
27%
UEI
TQ5MWGSBSF75
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.5MFY2017
  2. 5.1MFY2018
  3. 6.6MFY2019
  4. 5MFY2020
  5. 4MFY2021
  6. 10.7MFY2022
  7. 17.3MFY2023
  8. 11.3MFY2024
  9. 16.5MFY2025
  10. 22.8MFY2026
  11. 536.6KFY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 100 awards
  2. 3 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$16.5M72%
  2. Professional services$6.3M28%

Where the work was performed

  1. Salem city, VA$761.2K3.3%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition28%
    US 39% · $6.4M
  • Sole-source awards0.9%
    US 30% · $213K
  • Single-offer competitions27%
    US 8.7% · $6.1M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs· Pinellas County, FL· Professional services· Sep 28, 2023 – Aug 25, 2026· 36C10F23N0063
  2. Department of the Army· Honolulu County, HI· Construction & real property· Sep 15, 2022 – Feb 24, 2026· W9128A22F0032
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· Aug 31, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026· 36C77626N0800
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs· Hinds County, MS· Construction & real property· Jun 23, 2023 – Sep 1, 2026· 36C25623C0055
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· Fresno County, CA· Construction & real property· Jun 21, 2022 – Aug 31, 2026· 36C26122N0568
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs· Mesa County, CO· Construction & real property· Sep 23, 2026 – Sep 23, 2026· 36C25926N0496
  7. Department of Veterans Affairs· Hampshire County, MA· Construction & real property· Sep 22, 2026 – Sep 22, 2026· 36C24126N0942
  8. Department of Veterans Affairs· Sacramento County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 22, 2025 – Oct 5, 2026· 36C26125N0750

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $597.2K reported

  1. CENTREVILLE, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TOLAND MIZELL MOLNAR LLC$34.7M+662% in FY2026
    ATLANTA, GA · 4 entities · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. APOGEE CONSULTING GROUP, P.A.$37M−38% in FY2026
    CARY, NC · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SPUR DESIGN, LLC$45.2M−19% in FY2026
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.