Federal contractor · MELVILLE, NY

DECILOG, INC.

DECILOG, INC. received $1.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−89% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $129.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($1.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.7M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
32%
UEI
HYNSB5YZHBG5
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 11.7MFY2017
  2. 12.9MFY2018
  3. 13.4MFY2019
  4. 13.8MFY2020
  5. 11.8MFY2021
  6. 16.7MFY2022
  7. 17.6MFY2023
  8. 14.7MFY2024
  9. 15.2MFY2025
  10. 1.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$1.7M100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$1.2M68%
  2. Professional services$553.3K32%

Where the work was performed

  1. Suffolk County, NY$1.7M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition32%
    US 39% · $553.3K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions32%
    US 8.8% · $553.3K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. FCS&T DFCS REQUIREMENT BASE AWARD$23.2M
    Department of the Army· Suffolk County, NY· Research & development· Sep 14, 2022 – May 15, 2026· W15QKN22F0611
  2. PROVIDING ADA PROGRAMMING AND AFATDS SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTISE SUPPORT.$4.5M
    Department of the Army· Suffolk County, NY· Research & development· Jun 20, 2023 – Jun 4, 2026· W15QKN23F0407
  3. THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR COMPUTER RESOURCES RELATED TO THE AH 64E APACHE HELICOPTER FOR THE U.S. ARMY AND FOREIGN MILITARY SALES AIDING, DEVCOM ARMAMENT CENTER SYSTEM ANALYSIS AT OEM FACILITIES.$553.3K
    Department of the Army· Suffolk County, NY· Professional services· Jan 29, 2026 – Jan 29, 2026· W15QKN26FA118

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $147.6K reported

  1. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$147.6K
    RESTON, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BEAT-ATC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY$26.6M+13% in FY2026
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. SPIDER STRATEGIES, INC.$26.6M−23% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. ZANTECH IT SERVICES, INC.$37.2M−24% in FY2026
    VIENNA, VA · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.