Federal contractor · SETAGAYA-KU

DESIGN INTEL SYSTEMS CO., LTD.

DESIGN INTEL SYSTEMS CO., LTD. received $292.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards. Since FY2017: $2.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($292.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$292.2K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
WW4JTW5776T3
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 477.6KFY2017
  2. 494.6KFY2019
  3. 282.2KFY2020
  4. 324KFY2023
  5. 726.5KFY2024
  6. 0FY2025
  7. 292.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$292.2K100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$292.2K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$292.2K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $292.2K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $292.2K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ALLIANCE TRANSFORMATION AND REALIGNMENT (ATARA) PROJECT MC4023-T, TELECOM FACILITY CAMP HANSEN, OKINAWA, JAPAN$360.2K
    Department of the Army· Construction & real property· May 29, 2024 – Apr 6, 2026· W912HV24F0019
  2. PREPARATION OF CRITERIA PACKAGE (CP) FOR FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FIP), AR2602 BOILER PLANT AND SYSTEMS SAGAMIHARA FAMILY HOUSING AREA, JAPAN.$292.2K
    Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Dec 10, 2025 – Dec 10, 2025· W912HV26FA005

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. IEA-HALFF JV$1.1M−100% in FY2026
    DALLAS, TX · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. KIPLE ACQUISITION SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY LOGISTICS ENGINEERING INCORPORATED$1.1M+76% in FY2026
    FOREST HILL, MD · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. FRANK X. SPENCER AND ASSOCIATES, INC$1.1M−100% in FY2026
    EL PASO, TX · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.