Federal contractor · NICEVILLE, FL

DISRUPTIVE ELECTRONIC WARFARE MACHINES, LLC

DISRUPTIVE ELECTRONIC WARFARE MACHINES, LLC received $540K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−81% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $4.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($500K).

Obligations · FY2026
$540K
New awards
3
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
J2ELA3J58L45
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.2MFY2024
  2. 2.8MFY2025
  3. 540KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$500K93%
    2 awards
  2. Department of the Army$40K7.4%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$500K93%
  2. Education & social services$40K7.4%

Where the work was performed

  1. Okaloosa County, FL$500K93%
  2. Juneau County, WI$40K7.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $540K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $540K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Air Force$500K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of the Army$40K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. X-BAND RADAR TARGET (DART X-BAND)$1.2M
    Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Research & development· May 21, 2025 – Mar 24, 2026· FA864925P0327
  2. ATTRITABLE RADAR TARGET THIS IS A SBIR PHASE III SET-ASIDE$500K
    Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Other equipment & supplies· May 19, 2026 – May 19, 2026· FA282326C0016
  3. DART-C EMITTER SYSTEM TRAINING IAW ATTACHED SOW.$40K
    Department of the Army· Juneau County, WI· Education & social services· Mar 18, 2026 – Mar 18, 2026· W50S9H26PA015

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $100K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP$100K100%
    MC LEAN, VA · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $100K reported

  1. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED$100K
    PASCAGOULA, MS · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AMERICAN ECOTECH L.C.$3.3M
    WARREN, RI · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. GLEASON RESEARCH ASSOCIATES INC$3.1M
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. KESTREL INSTITUTE$3.1M−100% in FY2026
    PALO ALTO, CA · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.