Federal contractor · PRINEVILLE, OR

DONALD P KRIDER

DONALD P KRIDER received $162.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−46% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.6M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($162.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$162.2K
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
S96JY5DFRCN5
Small businessVeteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 15KFY2017
  2. 153.9KFY2020
  3. 285.3KFY2021
  4. 224.4KFY2022
  5. 191.1KFY2023
  6. 301.1KFY2024
  7. 301.7KFY2025
  8. 162.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$162.2K100%
    4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$162.2K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Clackamas County, OR$89K55%
  2. Crook County, OR$42K26%
  3. Wheeler County, OR$31.2K19%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $162.2K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $162.2K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. DONALD P KRIDER ORMHF000688 E431$62.4K
    Forest Service· Clackamas County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Aug 7, 2026 – Aug 7, 2026· 12569R26M1103
  2. DONALD P KRIDER OROCF000500 E136$42K
    Forest Service· Crook County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Jul 22, 2026 – Jul 22, 2026· 12569R26M0346
  3. DONALD P KRIDER OR953S000587 E334$31.2K
    Forest Service· Wheeler County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Sep 12, 2026 – Sep 12, 2026· 12569R26M1490
  4. DONALD P KRIDER ORMHF000688 E393$26.6K
    Forest Service· Clackamas County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Aug 5, 2026 – Aug 5, 2026· 1204H126M8538

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LEAN INNOVATIONS, INC$740.7K−62% in FY2026
    POWELL BUTTE, OR · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
  2. INLAND FOREST MANAGEMENT, INC.$720.4K+11% in FY2026
    SANDPOINT, ID · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
  3. HALEY, TODD B$690.7K−39% in FY2026
    BEND, OR · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.