Federal contractor · GARDEN VALLEY, ID

DRAKE CONSULTING LLC

DRAKE CONSULTING LLC received $107.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−93% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($107.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$107.8K
New awards
7
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
G9GPU5S1UQL3
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 702.5KFY2017
  2. 36.5KFY2018
  3. 0FY2019
  4. 453.1KFY2021
  5. 383.2KFY2022
  6. 345KFY2023
  7. 337.2KFY2024
  8. 1.7MFY2025
  9. 107.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$118K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Taylor County, TX· Equipment maintenance· Sep 29, 2025 – Feb 6, 2026· FA466125P0126
  2. Department of the Air Force· Houston County, GA· IT & telecom· Sep 26, 2025 – Nov 19, 2025· FA850125P0066
  3. Department of the Air Force· Houston County, GA· IT & telecom· Sep 26, 2025 – Nov 20, 2025· FA850125P0064
  4. Department of the Air Force· Houston County, GA· IT & telecom· Sep 17, 2025 – Nov 21, 2025· FA850125P0056
  5. Department of the Air Force· Taylor County, TX· Equipment maintenance· Jun 5, 2026 – Jun 5, 2026· FA466126P0021
  6. Department of the Air Force· Houston County, GA· IT & telecom· Sep 26, 2025 – May 27, 2026· FA850125P0068
  7. Department of the Army· Chatham County, GA· Equipment maintenance· Aug 28, 2025 – Nov 17, 2025· W50S7025CA003

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $978.5K reported

  1. ANCHORAGE, AK · 2 subawards · Investigation and security services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Investigation and security services
  2. SHREVEPORT, LA · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Investigation and security services
  3. SCOTT TOTAL SECURITY LIMITED$3.1M−91% in FY2026
    STROUD, GLOUCESTERSHIRE, GBR · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Investigation and security services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.