Federal contractor · FAIRFAX, VA

DYNAMIC SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC.

DYNAMIC SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC. received $3.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−64% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $248.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($3.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.3M
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
L9A4B33LXR15
Other than small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 21.8MFY2017
  2. 34.1MFY2018
  3. 33.5MFY2019
  4. 29.7MFY2020
  5. 31.4MFY2021
  6. 31.3MFY2022
  7. 25.9MFY2023
  8. 28MFY2024
  9. 9.3MFY2025
  10. 3.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$3.3M100%
    5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$3.3M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$3.1M93%
  2. Fairfax County, VA$577.7K17%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. THIS TO IS FOR THE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (ARNG) SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROGRAM (SAP), SUICIDE PREVENTION PROGRAM (SPP) AND RISK REDUCTION SUPPORT$77.4M
    Department of the Army· Fairfax city, VA· Professional services· Jul 17, 2020 – Apr 8, 2026· W15QKN20F0528
  2. AWARD ARMY COMMUNITY SERVICE FORT HOOD AND FORT BLISS$9.7M
    Department of the Army· Fairfax city, VA· Professional services· Sep 22, 2020 – May 13, 2026· W15QKN20F0713
  3. MILITARY HUMAN RESOURCES (MHR), MILITARY PERSONNEL DIVISION (MPD), TRANSITION CENTER (TC), RETIREMENT SERVICES OFFICE (RSO) AND NON- PERSONNEL SERVICES DELIVERY REDESIGN (PSDR) S1 SERVICES FOR US ARMY INSTALLATIONS IN THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA.$9.5M
    Department of the Army· Professional services· Feb 4, 2025 – Apr 27, 2026· W91QVN25CA001
  4. ADMINISTRATIVE, POSTAL SERVICES AND PERSONNEL PROCESSING SERVICES TO THE UNITED STATES ARMY GARRISON, DIRECTORATE OF HUMAN RESOURCES, FORT POLK, LOUISIANA.$6.7M
    Department of the Army· Fairfax city, VA· Professional services· Aug 17, 2020 – May 21, 2026· W15QKN20F0605
  5. AWARD ARMY COMMUNITY SERVICE FORT CAVAZOS AND FORT BLISS$3.3M
    Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Sep 11, 2025 – Apr 10, 2026· W15QKN25F0422

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $751.3K paid out · $293K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.6M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $9.4M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.8M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $323.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $751.3K reported

  1. INDIGO GROUP, LLC$751.3K
    MONTGOMERY, AL · 1 subaward · Individual and family services

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $13.4M reported

  1. MAGELLAN FEDERAL, INC.$9.4M
    ARLINGTON, VA · 8 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SERCO INC$1.7M
    HERNDON, VA · 2 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. ZEIDERS ENTERPRISES, INC.$1.2M
    WOODBRIDGE, VA · 1 subaward · Other financial investment activities

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CANVAS MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC$32.4M−62% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. THE SOLUTION FOUNDRY, LLC$31.6M−42% in FY2026
    WOODSTOCK, GA · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. MINATOISHI PALUMBO ARCHITECTS, INC.$29.3M+78% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Dynamic Systems Technology IncAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2026
$12K
2 reports
Lobbying · 2025–2026
$68K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$56K
    3 reports
  2. 2026$12K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Health issues3 reports
  2. Consumer issues, safety and products2 reports
  3. Veterans2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)2 reports
  2. Veterans Affairs - Dept of (VA)2 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)1 reports
  4. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. MO STRATEGIES, INC.$50K
    2 reports
  2. American Made Strategies LLC$18K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.