Federal contractor · FAIRFAX, VA

DZYNE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

DZYNE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC received $47.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−21% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $363.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($47.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$47.7M
New awards
6
Sole-source
83%
Single offer
2.5%
UEI
H5CDSXZGE983
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 10.1MFY2017
  2. 11.5MFY2018
  3. 40.3MFY2019
  4. 84.9MFY2020
  5. 32.1MFY2021
  6. 22.1MFY2022
  7. 23.2MFY2023
  8. 30.7MFY2024
  9. 60.8MFY2025
  10. 47.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$39.5M83%
  2. Research & development$8.2M17%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition85%
    US 39% · $40.7M
  • Sole-source awards83%
    US 30% · $39.5M
  • Single-offer competitions2.5%
    US 8.8% · $1.2M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Orange County, CA· Professional services· Apr 22, 2026 – Jun 18, 2026· FA869126CB007
  2. Department of the Air Force· Orange County, CA· Research & development· Dec 20, 2024 – Feb 19, 2026· FA238525FB001
  3. Department of the Air Force· Fairfax County, VA· Research & development· Jun 17, 2022 – Apr 21, 2026· FA865022C1175
  4. Department of the Air Force· Orange County, CA· Research & development· Dec 12, 2023 – May 18, 2026· FA238524FB001
  5. Department of the Air Force· Orange County, CA· Research & development· Feb 21, 2024 – May 15, 2026· FA238524FB002
  6. Department of the Navy· Fairfax County, VA· Research & development· Apr 21, 2026 – Apr 21, 2026· N6833526F0002

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $4.1M (26 subawards)

20 sub-recipients

  1. SANTA CLARITA, CA · 1 subaward
  2. BEDFORD, MA · 1 subaward
  3. STEMME USA, INC.$390.3K9.5%
    WEST COLUMBIA, SC · 3 subawards
  4. MAG DS CORP$329.8K8.1%
    FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward
  5. ALL-ISR, INC$320.8K7.8%
    ZEPHYRHILLS, FL · 1 subaward
  6. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 2 subawards
  7. TAMPA, FL · 1 subaward
  8. DES MOINES, IA · 2 subawards
  9. BOULDER, CO · 1 subaward
  10. DAYTON, OH · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 8.6% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $3.2M paid out · $3.5M received
  • FY2022: $4.5M paid out · $3.9M received
  • FY2023: $6.6M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $12.7M paid out · $3.8M received
  • FY2025: $2.1M paid out · $2.6M received
  • FY2026: $4.1M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

69 companies · $33.3M reported

  1. PASADENA, CA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. LAFAYETTE, CO · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. RESTON, VA · 10 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $13.7M reported

  1. TUCSON, AZ · 13 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ARLINGTON, VA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. PASCAGOULA, MS · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GEMINI TECHNICAL SERVICES JV, LLC$146.3M−39% in FY2026
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. X-BOW LAUNCH SYSTEMS INC$169.2M−96% in FY2026
    ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. ALTAMIRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP$177.8M−12% in FY2026
    MCLEAN, VA · 2 entities · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • DZYNE TechnologiesAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$270K
5 reports
Lobbying · 2024–2026
$690K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2024$240K
    4 reports
  2. 2025$270K
    5 reports
  3. 2026$180K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense13 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations10 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES13 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE13 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. CT Group fka CTF GLOBAL LLC$600K
    10 reports
  2. Summit Strategies Government Affairs LLC$90K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.