Federal contractor · HUNT VALLEY, MD

EA-BAKER PARTNERS JV

EA-BAKER PARTNERS JV received $34.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+14% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $71.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($34.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$34.5M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
VEQFHP9412J7
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6.7MFY2024
  2. 30.2MFY2025
  3. 34.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$34.5M100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$34.5M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Douglas County, NE$31.9M93%
  2. Baltimore County, MD$2.5M7.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. CY26 LEAK DETECTION TESTING TASK ORDER$31.9M
    Department of the Army· Douglas County, NE· Construction & real property· Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 7, 2025· W9128F26FA014
  2. CY26 LEAK DETECTION OPERATOR TRAINING$2.5M
    Department of the Army· Baltimore County, MD· Construction & real property· Dec 22, 2025 – Dec 22, 2025· W9128F26FA025
  3. A-E SERVICES IDC USACE UNR BASE PERIOD$0
    Department of the Army· Alexandria city, VA· Construction & real property· Jul 30, 2024 – Dec 19, 2025· W9128F24F0166

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. IRONMOUNTAIN SOLUTIONS, LLC$70.9M+66% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. F3EA INC$83.6M+89% in FY2026
    SAVANNAH, GA · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. AECOM INTERNATIONAL INC.$87.4M−41% in FY2026
    NEU-ISENBURG, DEU · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.