Federal contractor · VALLEY, AL

EAST ALABAMA WATER, SEWER AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

EAST ALABAMA WATER, SEWER AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT received $20K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (0% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $172.2K. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($20K).

Obligations · FY2026
$20K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
WQDPLLGVSFK6
Other than small businessGovernment entity
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 20.2KFY2017
  2. 3.4KFY2018
  3. 17KFY2019
  4. 15KFY2020
  5. 10KFY2021
  6. 17.6KFY2022
  7. 34KFY2023
  8. 15KFY2024
  9. 20KFY2025
  10. 20KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$20K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$20K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Troup County, GA$20K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $20K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $20K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. WATER UTILITY SERVICES$168.4K
    Department of the Army· Troup County, GA· Facilities & utilities· Sep 27, 2017 – Dec 17, 2025· W9127817C0032

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

EAST ALABAMA WATER, SEWER AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards), −100% vs FY2025.

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$12M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 11.6MFY2021
  2. 0FY2022
  3. 0FY2023
  4. 322.9KFY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2025.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PINTLALA WATER SYSTEM, INC$55K−50% in FY2026
    HOPE HULL, AL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Water, sewage and other systems
  2. CITY OF CUMMING$54K−100% in FY2026
    CUMMING, GA · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Water, sewage and other systems
  3. COLUMBIA COUNTY GEORGIA$54K0% in FY2026
    EVANS, GA · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Water, sewage and other systems

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.