Federal contractor · BURLINGAME, CA

ECC ENVIRONMENTAL LLC

ECC ENVIRONMENTAL LLC received $7.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (−57% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $131.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($7.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$7.2M
New awards
9
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
TFLBYLNQ4JH7
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 19.6MFY2020
  2. 12.7MFY2021
  3. 30.4MFY2022
  4. 3MFY2023
  5. 42.4MFY2024
  6. 16.6MFY2025
  7. 7.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 8 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$4.1M57%
  2. Facilities & utilities$3.1M43%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Orange County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Dec 19, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025· N6247324F4164
  2. Department of the Army· Burlington County, NJ· Facilities & utilities· Feb 20, 2025 – Sep 2, 2026· W912DQ25F3021
  3. Department of the Army· Essex County, NJ· Facilities & utilities· Dec 7, 2023 – Jun 4, 2026· W912DQ24F3003
  4. Department of the Army· Saunders County, NE· Facilities & utilities· Dec 15, 2022 – Apr 22, 2026· W912DQ23F3010
  5. Department of the Army· Chelan County, WA· Construction & real property· Mar 20, 2026 – Jun 10, 2026· W9128F26FA059
  6. Department of the Army· San Mateo County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Sep 17, 2025 – Aug 24, 2026· W912DQ25F3059
  7. Department of the Army· Jackson County, KS· Facilities & utilities· Jul 2, 2024 – Jun 11, 2026· W912DQ24F3035
  8. Department of the Army· McPherson County, KS· Facilities & utilities· Dec 21, 2023 – Nov 26, 2025· W912DQ24F3019

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PIKA INTERNATIONAL, INC.$40.6M−72% in FY2026
    STAFFORD, TX · 2 entities · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. OVERLAND PARK, KS · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. BAY WEST LLC$47.5M−85% in FY2026
    SAINT PAUL, MN · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.