Federal contractor · KIRKLAND, WA

ECHODYNE CORP

ECHODYNE CORP received $18.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−48% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $58.3M. Its largest customer was Department of State ($15M).

Obligations · FY2026
$18.5M
New awards
4
Sole-source
81%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
PQ2DF16FQHA3
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 46KFY2017
  2. 59.9KFY2018
  3. 114.4KFY2019
  4. 183.9KFY2020
  5. 1.1MFY2021
  6. 3MFY2022
  7. 35.3MFY2025
  8. 18.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of State$15M81%
    2 awards
  2. Department of the Army$3.5M19%
    1 awards
  3. Federal Aviation Administration$64.5K0.3%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$18.5M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$15M81%
  2. King County, WA$3.5M19%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition81%
    US 39% · $15.1M
  • Sole-source awards81%
    US 30% · $15.1M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications81%
    US 5.1% · $15M

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of State$15M
    Department of State · 1 awards
  2. Federal Aviation Administration$64.5K
    Department of Transportation · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. COUNTER-DRONE RADARS, TECHNICAL SUPPORT, AND TRAINING.$35.3M
    Department of State· King County, WA· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 31, 2025 – Feb 18, 2026· 19AQMM25C1050
  2. INL KYIV RADAR SYSTEMS, SPARE PARTS, TRAINING, AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT.$15M
    Department of State· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 5, 2026 – Mar 5, 2026· 19AQMM26C0298
  3. PROCUREMENT OF ECHOSHIELD RADARS, RADAR DEPLOYMENT KITS, SOFTWARE UPDATES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT, AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES.$3.5M
    Department of the Army· King County, WA· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 13, 2026 – Mar 27, 2026· W912CH26PA005
  4. ASSETS IN SUPPORT OF THE NAS$64.5K
    Federal Aviation Administration· King County, WA· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 24, 2026 – Feb 24, 2026· 6973GH26P01094

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $2.5M (4 subawards)

3 primes

  1. MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.$2M78%
    HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward
  2. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.$425.5K17%
    MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward
  3. GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.$123K4.9%
    FAIRFAX, VA · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $349.3K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $172.6K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $45.2K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2.7M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $2.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $5.8M reported

  1. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC$2.6M
    MCLEAN, VA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.$2M
    HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward · Other support activities for transportation
  3. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$835.5K
    GROTON, CT · 7 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FEDERAL RESOURCES SUPPLY COMPANY, LLC$127M−104% in FY2026
    STEVENSVILLE, MD · 2 entities · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. THE PROSPECTIVE GROUP, LLC$118.8M−27% in FY2026
    FAIRFAX, VA · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. WILBUR TECHNICAL SERVICES LLC$5.1M+216% in FY2026
    MONT VERNON, NH · 8.1% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • ECHODYNE CORPAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2026
$22.5K
2 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$123.8K
$33.8K in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$90K
    3 reports
  2. 2025$11.3K
    1 reports
  3. 2026$22.5K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Homeland security6 reports
  2. Aviation, aircraft and airlines3 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations3 reports
  4. Defense3 reports
  5. Transportation3 reports
  6. Aerospace2 reports
  7. Science and technology2 reports
  8. Law enforcement, crime and criminal justice1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES6 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE6 reports
  3. Natl Security Council (NSC)3 reports
  4. White House Office3 reports
  5. Energy - Dept of2 reports
  6. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)2 reports
  7. Interior - Dept of (DOI)2 reports
  8. Transportation - Dept of (DOT)2 reports
  9. Homeland Security - Dept of (DHS)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Strategic Marketing Innovations$90K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.