Federal contractor · VANCOUVER

ECOMETRIC RESEARCH INC.

ECOMETRIC RESEARCH INC. received $43.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (+0.1% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $404.1K. Its largest customer was U.S. Geological Survey ($43.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$43.2K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
EWT5J52DGJM4
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 59.5KFY2020
  2. 59.5KFY2021
  3. 59.5KFY2022
  4. 79.5KFY2023
  5. 59.5KFY2024
  6. 43.2KFY2025
  7. 43.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$43.2K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$43.2K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Geological Survey· Professional services· Aug 14, 2025 – Jul 24, 2026· 140G0325P0210

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

ECOMETRIC RESEARCH INC. received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 0FY2022

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2022.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. EUREKA, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Geological Survey · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. MARDA SCIENCE, LLC$170.8K−254% in FY2026
    FLAGSTAFF, AZ · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Geological Survey · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. CHARLES TREXLER$180K−100% in FY2026
    SAN JOSE, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Geological Survey · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.