Federal contractor · VIENNA, VA

EDC CONSULTING, LLC

EDC CONSULTING, LLC received -$183.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−164% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $9.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
-$183.5K
New awards
3
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
WCVMGHCG9LA7
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.8MFY2017
  2. 1.6MFY2018
  3. 485.8KFY2019
  4. 645.6KFY2020
  5. 263.6KFY2021
  6. 1.6MFY2022
  7. 1.7MFY2023
  8. 720.5KFY2024
  9. 285.3KFY2025
  10. -183.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$00.0%
    1 awards
  2. Office of the Inspector General-$183.5K0.0%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. ANALYST SUPPORT SERVICES$765.5K
    Office of the Inspector General· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 27, 2021 – Jul 31, 2026· 70VT1521F00024
  2. TASK ORDER EDC CIO$651.1K
    Office of the Inspector General· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Mar 2, 2023 – Dec 15, 2025· 70VT1523F00005
  3. SEAPORT NXG MINIMUM OBLIGATION TASK ORDER$500
    Department of the Navy· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Jan 2, 2019 – Mar 30, 2026· N0017819F7563

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $144K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION$144K100%
    BETHESDA, MD · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $8.1M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $24.5M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $5.4M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.4M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.6M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $144K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $41.1M reported

  1. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION$36.3M
    BETHESDA, MD · 75 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$2.6M
    GROTON, CT · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$2.2M
    LEXINGTON, MA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KIKODA, LLC$235.5K
    TALLAHASSEE, FL · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Inspector General · Computer systems design and related services
  2. MVS INC$1.8M+102% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Inspector General · Computer systems design and related services
  3. CLEARPRO PARTNERS LLC$3.4M−100% in FY2026
    LEESBURG, VA · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Inspector General · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.