Federal contractor · OWINGS, MD

EDGE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

EDGE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC received $331.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+124% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $563.6K. Its largest customer was U.S. Customs and Border Protection ($335K).

Obligations · FY2026
$331.7K
New awards
6
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
KPNKWFLG2FY9
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 83.9KFY2024
  2. 148KFY2025
  3. 331.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$335K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $335K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $335K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Homeland Security · 5 awards

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Customs and Border Protection· District of Columbia, DC· Equipment maintenance· Sep 22, 2026 – Sep 22, 2026· 70B01C26P00000476
  2. U.S. Customs and Border Protection· District of Columbia, DC· Equipment maintenance· Sep 22, 2026 – Sep 22, 2026· 70B01C26P00000463
  3. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission· District of Columbia, DC· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 13, 2023 – May 12, 2026· 9531BV24P0001OSH
  4. U.S. Customs and Border Protection· District of Columbia, DC· Equipment maintenance· Sep 24, 2026 – Sep 24, 2026· 70B01C26P00000367
  5. U.S. Customs and Border Protection· District of Columbia, DC· Equipment maintenance· Sep 23, 2026 – Sep 23, 2026· 70B01C26P00000375
  6. U.S. Customs and Border Protection· Calvert County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Sep 24, 2026 – Sep 24, 2026· 70B01C26P00000474

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $119K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $119K reported

  1. LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BAYAMON, PR · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Customs and Border Protection · Building equipment contractors
  2. ARDSLEY, NY · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Customs and Border Protection · Building equipment contractors
  3. P. ENGINEERING, PLLC$1.5M−4.3% in FY2026
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Customs and Border Protection · Building equipment contractors

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.