Federal contractor · CYPRESS, CA

EIZO INC.

EIZO INC. received $57K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards. Its largest customer was Federal Aviation Administration ($57K).

Obligations · FY2026
$57K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
HTNRBLNUYQJ3
Parent company
EIZO CORPORATION
Other than small businessForeign-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the EIZO RUGGED SOLUTIONS INC. company family: 2 registered entities, $986.9K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. EIZO RUGGED SOLUTIONS INC.ORLANDO, FL · Family page
    $929.9K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 57KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Federal Aviation Administration$57K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$57K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Atlantic County, NJ$57K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $57K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $57K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Federal Aviation Administration$57K
    Department of Transportation · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. PROCUREMENT OF EIZO, INC. (EIZO), E-LFC FIRMWARE DEVELOPMENT E-LFC$57K
    Federal Aviation Administration· Atlantic County, NJ· IT & telecom· Dec 18, 2025 – Dec 18, 2025· 692M1526P00003

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $33.2M (2 subawards)

1 prime

  1. RAYTHEON COMPANY$33.2M100%
    MARLBOROUGH, MA · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $325.2K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $597.4K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $714.4K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $33.2M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

18 companies · $39.6M reported

  1. RAYTHEON COMPANY$34.5M
    TUCSON, AZ · 7 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. LEIDOS, INC.$1.3M
    RESTON, VA · 4 subawards · Data processing, hosting, and related services
  3. BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.$1.2M
    YORK, PA · 7 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WEIGHTS AND BIASES, INC$566.7K
    SAN FRANCISCO, CA · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Software publishers
  2. BROADAX SYSTEMS INCORPORATED$528.6K−80% in FY2026
    ONTARIO, CA · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturingNavy · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing
  3. EMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.$1.1M−5% in FY2026
    ROCHESTER, NY · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Software publishers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.