Federal contractor · SALT LAKE CITY, UT

ELIZABETH'S CUSTOM CATERING, LLC

ELIZABETH'S CUSTOM CATERING, LLC received $132.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−60% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $1.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($132.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$132.8K
New awards
7
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
24%
UEI
EUAGVKMTBDZ9
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 65KFY2022
  2. 256.5KFY2023
  3. 474.8KFY2024
  4. 334KFY2025
  5. 132.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 7 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$132.8K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition24%
    US 39% · $31.8K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions24%
    US 8.7% · $31.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Salt Lake County, UT· Facilities & utilities· May 28, 2026 – May 28, 2026· W911YP26FA015
  2. Department of the Army· Salt Lake County, UT· Facilities & utilities· May 21, 2026 – May 21, 2026· W911YP26FA014
  3. Department of the Army· Salt Lake County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Feb 11, 2026 – Feb 11, 2026· W911YP26FA004
  4. Department of the Army· Salt Lake County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Dec 9, 2025 – Dec 9, 2025· W911YP26FC009
  5. Department of the Army· Salt Lake County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Mar 12, 2026 – Mar 12, 2026· W9124X26PA005
  6. Department of the Army· Salt Lake County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Feb 22, 2026 – Feb 22, 2026· W911YP26FC015
  7. Department of the Army· Salt Lake County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Jan 31, 2026 – Jan 31, 2026· W911YP26FC013

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HOUSTON, TX · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Special food services
  2. REYNOLDSBURG, OH · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Special food services
  3. VINNY'S PIZZA II, LLC$817.8K−43% in FY2026
    NEWTON FALLS, OH · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Special food services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.