Federal contractor · SAINT LOUIS, MO

ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.

ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. received $286.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−90% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $6.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($286.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$286.3K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
CF5LFTAKXHJ3
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ENERGIZER, LLC company family: 2 registered entities, $625.6K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ENERGIZER, LLCSAINT LOUIS, MO · Family page
    $339.3K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 562.7KFY2017
  2. 795.8KFY2018
  3. 455.1KFY2019
  4. -26.1KFY2020
  5. 27.5KFY2021
  6. 1MFY2022
  7. 842.1KFY2024
  8. 2.8MFY2025
  9. 286.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$286.3K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $286.3K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $286.3K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· St. Louis County, MO· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 3, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026· W91CRB26FA181

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BEAM GLOBAL$9.1M−97% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other electrical equipment and component manufacturing
  2. FDH DEFENSE AFTERMARKET, LLC$15.3M−24% in FY2026
    COMMERCE, CA · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other electrical equipment and component manufacturing
  3. CND, LLC$4.2M+20% in FY2026
    STILWELL, OK · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other electrical equipment and component manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of ENERGIZER, LLC (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Energizer Holdings, Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$390K
7 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.2M

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$320K
    7 reports
  2. 2024$240K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$390K
    7 reports
  4. 2026$240K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Consumer issues, safety and products18 reports
  2. Manufacturing12 reports
  3. Environment and Superfund10 reports
  4. Labor issues, antitrust and workplace8 reports
  5. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code8 reports
  6. Trade (domestic and foreign)8 reports
  7. Transportation5 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE17 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES16 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$1M
    15 reports
  2. Ernst & Young LLP (Washington Council Ernst & Young)$100K
    4 reports
  3. ML Strategies, LLC$80K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.